A body K member

B bodies had them too and changed over in '68 just like the A-bodies. C-bodies were using the later style in '65, not sure about earlier.


:rofl:

You mean, the factory that couldn't get the suspension mounts located with better than a 1/4" tolerance? The factory welds that look like a blind guy did them? C'mon man. These cars were spot welded together on an assembly line that emphasized speed over quality. Anyone with a plumb bob, some basic geometry skills and a Harbor Freight welder can surpass the "factory precision"




Uh huh. How wide were those performance high speed radials? And what was the tire compound rated at?

Ma Mopar ditched that design 55 years ago because it was sub-par. Like 9" drum spindles, it was a poor design that was identified by the factory and replaced with improved, redesigned parts at great cost to the factory. That's not the kind of thing that the factory does just for fun, there was absolutely a reason for it. Maybe that reason wasn't outright failure, but they still decided it was worth the cost in the long run to change the design.

Say or believe what you want, I'd never cut off a 67 idler bracket to install the 68 sheet metal bracket. Neither would I go the other way. Not even close to the 9 in brake comparison.
235 wide long before compounds were rated. I was also one of the first to use Poly bushings back when you had to reuse the metal parts from your old bushings.
Not sure why they changed design, may have been cost also. You can think the newer design is stronger if you want. I would never bother changing a 67 idler mount. I look at them as the same. I doubt he OP would see any difference. You guys like to do a lot of work for little or no gain.