Probably a real dumb question but ....

Does the use of forced induction negate the need for compression?

We are doing a 9 to 1 comp. 528ci hemi build with twin turbo's next year.
Big cubes, big blowers and cheap GAS is all we can afford.

Race fuel is way too expensive 'these days' for a pensioner like me...:eek:

Lots of room in a boat for the add-ons.:drama:
Water cooled inter-cooler would help make BIg power methinks?
View attachment 1716179120
It negates the “need” for compression if you can meet your power requirements with lower compression and boost. It’s all just cylinder pressure. Weather you get there mechanically with compression or later with boost it really makes no difference. Think of boost as just a multiplier of what’s there. More compression does the same thing it does in an NA engine. And like I said above, we met my power goal in the boat without an intercooler and the tune up is safe. I have enough turbo to make 1800hp and the engine is built to live at 1500 or so, but it’s a 21 foot boat and 800 is enough to scare the **** out of my passengers and myself. So that’s where it’s staying and will live a long time at that power level.
At any compression over 10:1 the pressure the turbo puts out has to be very limited. 13:1 requires for street use with a carb and without computer control requires 100%+ octane fuel, adding more compression via a turbo requires more octain and ignition control. I run a supercharger on my slant six with with a boost referenced fuel pressure regulator, and a pressure referenced ignition control modual, at 8.5 compression I still run 94 to 100 octain depending on the boost I want.

View attachment 1716179141
Are you saying you can’t run big compression and big boost? Why does the “pressure the turbo puts out have to be very limited”? There are no hard and fast rules. You can run 15:1 compression and 50 pounds of boost if you want, just need the right fuel.