Is building a stroked 318 better than a stroked 340/360?

A lot depends on your intended use and expectations with budget in mind. A stroker should use longer conrods to keep close to the original rod to stroke ratio. The cheap way for a Chevy 383 is to use the 400 rods and syroker crank. Rod to stroke ratio is not advantageous unless you are building a low RPM pump or generator engine and you are looking for torque. Years ago one of the magazines did a multi issue test, starting with a 350 and then installed a stroker crank with 5.565" rods, being careful to maintain the CR the same. Then they put 5.7 rods in with pistons to match. Cam was the same. The short rod 383 made a bit more power and torque but not what you would expect. The long rod 383 picked up a bit of torque and power. Now the larger displacement needs a bit more cam to really shine. One thing noticed was the long rod engine was quieter.
With the short rods the piston moves away from TDC quickly and should develop good vacuum in the cylinders. Larger intake valves and higher lift should let that vacuum make its way to the carb. LSA is affected slightly, like 0.25°.

Are you forgetting cylinder heads and how they are affected by rod/stroke ratio?

I like that you can repeat what’s on the web, but in the real world if you are cylinder head limited, and virtually every small block Chrysler stroker is, you can’t just piss away rod ratio. If you do, it changes cam timing requirements. And pulling the piston away from the head sounds good on paper, until you look at cylinder airflow demand and crank angle.

Then you have to think about ignition timing and about getting the mass fraction burn timed.

It all adds up. Saying something doesn’t matter is ignoring all the relationships between these parts and how they affect one another.