Does this prove David Vizard's 128 lsa formula ?

You are missing the point. DV has a number of sayings, two of which are:
- the right cam costs the same as the wrong cam.
- so why not do some homework & buy the right cam using 128 or derivative.
- as HP goes up from matching all the component parts to work together, changes in ideal LSA, [ & adv/ret the cam ] have a much greater loss of HP than a randomly chosen cam that is not optimised for the combo.
The 128 cam is for parallel valve heads, 9-10.5 CR. For canted valve heads, the number becomes 131.5. In his BBC book, he talks of engines that require wider LSAs, 114-116. And how as CR increases the LSA needs to be wider than the target 9-10.5 CR.
I have three Crane cam catalogues. DV tested 000s of cams for Crane . In the latest catalogue after the testing was done, there was a huge increase in tight LSA cams, 106 & tighter. So Crane must have been happy with the test results to make those changes....
My point was say his formula recommends a 108 lsa then 110 and 106 should both should show drastic losses eg.. 30-50+ lbs-ft, what those test showed was fairly minor differences and going tighter then what DV would recommend still gain which pretty much what most would think anyways that tighter gives more midrange.