Is that not what I said in post #60 ?
I knew the were the same torque numbers just at different rpm.
Which is why, like I always say;
Back in the day, the 340 was never known for being torquey, whereas the hi-compression 318 was always known to be particularly torquey for it's size.
However;
I once installed a complete 318 top end onto a 340 with the 318 cam, and had a real stump puller. Probably close to par with my 367 today.
