Does this prove David Vizard's 128 lsa formula ?

You are missing the point. DV has a number of sayings, two of which are:
- the right cam costs the same as the wrong cam.
- so why not do some homework & buy the right cam using 128 or derivative.
- as HP goes up from matching all the component parts to work together, changes in ideal LSA, [ & adv/ret the cam ] have a much greater loss of HP than a randomly chosen cam that is not optimised for the combo.
The 128 cam is for parallel valve heads, 9-10.5 CR. For canted valve heads, the number becomes 131.5. In his BBC book, he talks of engines that require wider LSAs, 114-116. And how as CR increases the LSA needs to be wider than the target 9-10.5 CR.
I have three Crane cam catalogues. DV tested 000s of cams for Crane . In the latest catalogue after the testing was done, there was a huge increase in tight LSA cams, 106 & tighter. So Crane must have been happy with the test results to make those changes....
What the 128 formula does is simplify cylinder volumn and port flow calculations. Canted valve and hemi heads require a wider LSA due to flows. SBF engines with factory heads use 127. Good seat forms and fast off the seat valvetrains increase LSA due to increased low lift flow.
DV also states final LSA for a race engine shouldbe tested on a dyno using a number of LSA cams to zero in on what works best with the build combination.