Does this prove David Vizard's 128 lsa formula ?

My point was say his formula recommends a 108 lsa then 110 and 106 should both should show drastic losses eg.. 30-50+ lbs-ft, what those test showed was fairly minor differences and going tighter then what DV would recommend still gain which pretty much what most would think anyways that tighter gives more midrange.
If the formula recommends a 108°LSA, DV states there will be more loss using a 110°LSA cam than a 106°LSA cam. This is a base to start. High compression over 10.5:1 dictates an increase of 0.75° per compression point increase. So going from a 10.5CR to 13:1 would be 0.75 × 2.5 = 1.875° increase in LSA. Quick off the seat and high flow at low lift dictates more LSA. You need to watch Richard Holdner's video dynoing 4 LS cams. The tighter LSA cam beat the others across the whole RPM range tested. Get and read DV's book, How to Build Horsepower.
You probable could do worse then his formula, but it basically recommends what someone trying to get the most would run anyways, and seen no evidence that being 1-4 wider is a huge loss and tighter seems generally to be a gain and he talks it up as 30-50 tq+ gain by following him, the only gains I've seen like that is when people are wider by 6-12*.

To me it's like this, say I said I came up with a formula for street strip cam duration , and said it was the **** you couldn't do no better then to follow it and it generally recommended cams in the 235-255 range basically what people generally pick for street strip and cause those are the cams people generally want and the performance is obviously generally good then I say see I told ya my formula is the ****, that's what I'm kind of seeing here.