Yep! Sure was. I also call this test a bit bogus and not really tapping into the intakes potential. It’s a fine A-B-C test with a “Look what happens in this specific combination.” And that’s it. Just that specific deal right there.
This test also reminds me of the header test. It was exhaust manifolds vs shorty vs 1-5/8 vs TTI stepped be Hooker 1-3/4.
The engine was very mild. So, IMO, the headers were not taxed.
I don’t think the tests were bad, just narrow in the parts ability arena. The (big) problem is I now see and hear people quoting the test as gospel and the other parts now suck.
