2.76 vs 2.94 gearing

Just so you know;
Back in about 74 I installed a 340 into a 65 Valiant wagon that had been home to a slanty.
I used an A904 that I unbolted from a 273.
I left the 7.25 in the back. Hey nobody told me they were weak. I was 22ish at the time, maybe 21.
Only the short block was 340.
The entire top end was 318, including the cam and induction.
I installed some Hooker Fenderwell headers, the easiest way to hook that up.
To say that the 340 was a torque-monster would not do it justice.
I drove that car for three summers I think, peg-leging the ever-loving crap out of that baby.
And then the trans blew up.
I took the powertrain out, and gave the car to my little brother, who put the slanty back in, and drove it for several more years.
I still have that engine and trans. The car went AWOL, a long ago time ago. The brother is dead.

The point is that the 7.25, in my case at least, was NOT made of glass.
at the time, how many miles were on that 10 year old rear end? and what size were the tires?