Ported Victor 340 and Super Victor

It's been a minute since I was in fluid dynamics class, but I would think that a thinner profile would be preferred on the leading edge of the plenum divider. You are trying to divide the air as efficiently as you can, and a thin profile should produce less resistance to flow and subsequent turbulence down the port behind it. Remember that an airfoil or wing has a very different job than the divider, they are producing lift and have to have the longer path on one side. When you look at the tail surfaces that provide directional stability, they are thinner in cross section and more equal length top to bottom.
Just thinking out loud here. I agree with you that the thinner leading edge would provide less 'resistance' because of the lesser frontal area. But I do believe a thicker rounded edge would be more forgiving and allow for better flow efficiency if the vane was not accurately aligned with the air flow direction.

A vertical stabilizer on a plane would still be thicker and rounded on the leading edge and sharp on the back, would it not? Unlike a wing the profile would be symmetrical side to side.