New Coil-Over Conversion Suspension

DionR said

Too bad that doesn't fit the definition of "data".

View attachment 1716388366

So yeah, that fits the what I think of as a smokescreen.



Look, I honestly do like you. I like what you bring to the hobby, I like how you run your business, I like your product and if I was look for one I would buy yours. Even after butting heads here over and over. So the only expectations you fail to meet is that you won't admit that no one has any real facts to back up the support that a COC handles better or has improved geometry. Honestly, there isn't much on a TB suspension either, but there is more than any COC kit producer has shown.

Click to expand...

I get it, and you seem to be a little like me,.... hard headed. BTW, welcome to the club, I'm the president.

My goals never included "improved geometry", but to optimize with the most cost effective available off the shelf components in a compact, fully adjustable, adaptable with other aftermarket components and multi-Mopar engine combinations ....all in an affordable bolt-in coil over / rack and pinion package. Believe me, like you, I shake my head at the "improved geometry" claims. However, does a modern rack and pinion drive better better than even an upgraded 60's-70's steering box and their related components? My customers (my data), tell me.... hell yes!

I value your input, it is the only way I can learn in hopes to improve, but as far as suppling data. Gerst taught me an important lesson. Do not give out any information regardless of what bullshit story someone (Gerst) tells you. I have had several ask for specific data, in EVERY case, they were simply looking to build their own and by-pass their own R&D.

Denny