The 360 build that has more turns than Willow Springs

'67 - 91 318's came with 273 mechanical rockers??

I know that I have stated this a couple of times but it has been awhile since I’ve assembled a stock LA series engine. When you do something often enough, you just know things and don’t have as many hiccups in the build.

View attachment 1716393146

I called my machinist to remind me…. The notches in the big ends of the rods face OUTSIDE toward the oil pan rail.

View attachment 1716393148

With the pistons facing with the valve reliefs UP like so…

View attachment 1716393149

The chamfer in the big ends will need to be to the LEFT for all 8 rods.

View attachment 1716393150

The left side faces the fillet/counterweight. The right side will meet another rod on the crank pin and so the rod is almost flush with very little chamfer.


View attachment 1716393151

You can see better with a bearing in place. Note how the bearing below is tucked in a bit in this photo…

View attachment 1716393152

Then almost flush in this photo….

View attachment 1716393153

Many guys already knew this. Once I’m back doing this stuff it comes back to me. Having the pistons symmetrical does make it easier.

View attachment 1716393156

Next will be to file fit the rings. These KB Hypereutectic slugs have an unusual spec….

View attachment 1716393157

Really??? A .0065 gap factor means 4.040 X .0065. That is a .026 ring gap. That really seems wide but there it is as they call for.

View attachment 1716393158

The last section above shows a more common .004 factor for the second ring. That is approximately .016”. I have this weird memory of a set of pistons I had some time ago that called for a second ring with a bigger gap than the top. Did I just imagine that??
Onward….

Absolutely gap the rings as wide or wider than KB says. Any tighter and you'll be rebuilding again.