410 plus 36.4 tq & 8.5 hp over the 367, They never factor gearing when they make these comparisons, not saying the 367 is better but if geared and stalled right and with optimal shift points for best quarter mile I don't think there would be much difference and could even see the 367 squeak out the win.
Well, I knew this was going to go off the rails and I got about a page and a half into it, and it was well off the rails lol...
Anyways, I think I see what you're saying, maybe a lot of money and or something to get eight and a half extra horsepower or torque or whatever...
I watched this video a couple weeks ago on YouTube. So I vaguely remember him saying at the beginning. That it was a no-brainer, because a 4 inch crank from Scott, is like 350 bucks, and if you're rebuilding your engine, you're going to have to resize your factory rides and why not get Bring new rods for a $100 more that are yeah, lightweight, then stronger. And since you're rebuilding the engine, you're going to have to bore it and buy any pistons, anyhow and the pressure, those are about the same... and that kind of resonated with me as the reason I did it... thinking here was I had a great foundation for anything. I wanted to do like switching heads and cams, like I have in the past, and since I have more cubic inches, I can get the bigger ones and still run correctly...
Are you saying everything wouldn't be preventious with larger cubes?..
Also one guy did ask about rpms, as it seemed to be your point. The the three sixty seven could r p m more which I don't think that's proven and if it is it would be in the highest extremes( unusable ranges for both) I would imagine....