367 vs 410 Engines Masters

Mean416 said
@273

Honestly man, I'm pretty sure you know the math/theory here and you also know there's an abundance of dyno data out there to back up what you already know.

Really not sure the objective of the thread here (not that there needs to be one).

I thought people be interested in the video, but mentioned how I don't like how they compared these engine, then of course debate followed :)

Mean416 said
What are the performance criteria? All things being relatively equal except displacement, the bigger motor is gonna make more torque across the whole curve,

True

Mean416 said
up until the point where the heads are choking the combo.

This debate I didn't even see coming, I basically get what people mean the 410 needs better heads, but really don't makes sense to me the 367 ran out of air too and only a few hundred rpms higher and pretty much made same power so got the same out of them, but both could use better heads, but if your looking to make 425 hp this is basically what's need even the 425 hp 318 I posted wasn't too different.

Seem like everyone missed the post where they did put better heads on the 410 and gained 92 hp and 900 rpm's. I'll repost below.

Mean416 said
Both combos are gonna make about the same power and et/mph similar, assuming bith combos are reasonably optimized and sorted out. Because that's a function of power, which is a function of fuel burn rate which is a function of airflow.

The bigger motor is gonna run better on the street and generally be more fun.

This what I've been trying tell 92b.