367 vs 410 Engines Masters

I've read almost the whole thread so far, ugh...

410 made more torque over almost the entire rev range which mathematically translates to more "accelerative" force being applied to the car over that period.
Only if you handicap the 367 by not gearing it properly, I don't care if you do, I don't care if you think it's points against the 367, but act like 367 has less potential false, Torque doesn't move your car, torque and rpm move your car better known as hp, if you erase the two torque curves and just look at the HP curves (the ones that get your car down track) there not much difference other than one starts and ends a few hundred rpms higher, which requires more gears stall, you guys are acting like this is the 1st time you heard of the concept of matching drivetrain to an engines powerband.
367 only had a slightly higher redline so it's not going to produce as much acceleration when you integrate (calculus) the torque curve and compare the two. Now you can get into the mental masturbation of gearing, how many speeds in the transmission, torque converter stall speed etc etc but this is an engine comparison.
For torque lovers, the 367 needs more gear, more equals more torque there is only a 36 lbs-ft difference at peak, and through the rest of the powerband there's a way less difference, not gonna take too much gear to equal it out, torque at the crank ain't a bonus power.

That's all I took from the video and all I care about and I agree with the EM dudes.
Your free two
Adding in other elements to argue and compare about is just going down a pointless rabbit hole.
No it not pointless cause it creates all this torque at the crank has some kind of bonus power non sense and anyone building less than 360/408 is doomed to failure cause they can't make this bonus power. But what gets me, same people, if you want to big block your told it's not worth the effort lol.