Funny how people imply I just regurgitate what I read/watch but most of my arguments happen cause I question the status quo, my conclusions aren't the standard narrative that's in the books and on web.
wild assumptions and broad strokes of "what if's" are not "questioning the status quo". you're not a maverick, forging a new path.
not a single "conclusion" you've put forth has caused me pause or to rethink my approach to engine building. you're basically bench racing till you put up the numbers. which is fine... but don't paint it as anything more than that.