With that said why should our A-Bodies be worth any less then let’s say an E-Body. They were are all manufactured within a few years of each other, all made of the same metals and for the most part all have the same engines…
I have always maintained that judging by the numbers, even the original buyers thought the A-Body was the "better" car. In other words they sold more of them. It was obviously a better value. It had the same suspension and engineering.
Plus they have a larger “boot” to boot than an E-Body.
(I got rid of E-Bodies because I couldn’t get anything in the damned trunk when I went somewhere.
Chrysler leaf springs should be almost flat under the car’s weight. Chrysler felt this made for better handling. So these cars typically look like the springs are bad to people. Many people think they are supposed to be raked down from the rear.
Only the AAR and TA’s were.
That being said, everyone is correct. There is definitely something not right about this car’s stance.