Water4gas

Well, if you use higher output electronics and parallel batteries, there shouldn't be a short term problem with the needed amperage for the generator coils.....If efficiency is increased by a better burn, and better HP is a result as with NOS (but on a much smaller scale), then gas should be saved overall. 8)

The trouble is, you'd need a lot of batteries to generate enough hydrogen to do much of anything. I once calculated out what you'd need to get enough energy to get the equivalent of a 1 gallon of gas per hour - the results were things like a 2,500 amp current (assuming a 12 volt electrical system - it would be a better idea to have 2,500 volts and 12 amps), about one ton of batteries, etc.

needsaresto said
I dont mean to dis your knowledge but...while I do agree that the water4gas system is likely too small to have any real impact i think the theory of it is sound. After all the idea is to supplement the gasoline burn by increasing combustion temps,not replace it. Much the same effect is achieved when installing a propane system on a diesel.

That's not the theory most people who build these seem to go by - many of them seem to think they're adding fuel. However, if this is working it should be easily measurable using a couple of thermocouple probes to verify a hotter combustion temperature, and a dyno to verify more efficiency. Why have I never seen a dyno test of such a thing?

So you and some others seems to have a problem with the energy put in not equating to much energy put out.
Explain the atom bomb then. Or nuclear fission.

In both cases, these reactions convert mass to energy, and have nothing to do with the HHO arguement at all.

There were many genius inventors who flat out smashed all we knew about those laws and practically rewrote them. There WILL be an energy revolution,and soon.

A while ago you were saying the theory is sound, now you are saying that if such a thing works it will require rewriting the laws of physics. Which is it?

It was scoffed at by some. I challenge the naysayers to spend the $100 or so to build this hydrogen booster (as I am). Just be aware you need to fool the O2 sensor if so equipped.

I've got a better challenge. Anyone in the Atlanta area who thinks they can produce a measurable increase in engine efficiency with an HHO system, PM me and I'll see if I can arrange to get you some time on a chassis dyno. We'll take a couple of pulls with and without the system on, and if it's on an injected car I will be measuring the injector pulse width as a proxy for fuel flow. If this thing works, it should show a significant gain in horsepower as well as mileage since you are claiming it boost efficiency.