**r*a*n*t**

Ace said
So whatever this bias you have against me, my car, 8.75s or whatever it is that put the wild hair up your butt, I think it is only in your imagination.

I'll have to check and recheck but Im almost positive that i made in no subtle nor out right way a bias or dorogative comment towards you your car or your momma, you should try to understand that I myself.. No other parties am strugling with how close minded some people can be to a seperate way of life and how that maybe JUST maybe a 8.25 may out beat a 8.75 in the quarter mile put behind the asme motor in the same conditions and driven by my identicle twin, like i stated clearer then day in my other post, I am in no need of anger or upset individuals towards me.

With the fact still remaining that my ORIGINAL argument was simply on how most people you ask,"id like to upgrade my rear from a 7.25 to something larger and im on a fine budget, 80% of people who know somewhat of which they speak simply recommend the more infamous 8.75, completely ignoring the fact that not even 28 seconds ago I had mentioned im looking for some kind of cheaper solution to a what is normally a more exspensive upgrade for most. since they only NEED to do it once and do it right the first time.

Arguing THAT bias almost "UNbelievablely arrogant" :wack: topic as i want heard stated I cant understand why people dont praise the 8.25 or a (hmm) 8.8 with disks from a ferd. A simple 9" from a Ferd which until today i thought would be a cheaper route since they are a more pupular rear with multiple options for upgrade and local parts would be cheaper.

I simply, from the get go just wanted my voice herd and a question answered.

Whats so gung-ho about a 8.75? versus a different rear end from ma mopar or a different producer.
And more or less letting off steam, since my battle to find a 8.75 has lead me down a rough road and opther options are heavily concidered at this point.

:sign5:Lmao, Im thinking about renaming the thread 'Battle Of The Fittest'
any oppinions?