It went like this in compared to the "as supplied" 2.02 RHS's: We did improve on the RHS's but that's not the point of this posting. This is with the VJ that came on the EQ's and an OEM 1.92 Mag intake valve (the only 1.92 we had...) Then tried a 2.02 from the RHS head...
RHS EQ EQ
2.02 1.92 2.02
0.100 68.9 72.4 73.1
0.150 101.4 104.5 109.5
0.200 131.8 129.2 143.4
0.250 160.6 156.9 170.7
0.300 185.7 182.3 193.5
0.350 207.4 203.2 214.8
0.400 225.3 216.9 231.3
0.450 238.9 223.1 243.3
0.500 248.5 228.2 242.9
0.550 252.2 229.9 239.9
0.600 255.3 229.2 239.7
Interesting to note that up to .450 lift the 2.02 EQ's were better than the 2.02 RHS heads! For a guy who already has a 318/360 Mag, these EQ's and your stock rocker gear are a heck of a deal! I'm temped to build a 360 just for these EQ's...would be one heck of a street motor! Next a complete set of valves are on the way and we'll see what we can get out of the EQ's.
Please note the disclaimer: This is not intended to get into a flowbench "race", or to knock or challenge anyone else's findings. It is information only that I thought it might be of some interest to some.
