Badguy Alert Moparcrazy

OK, obviously the transaction occurred a while back, and the seller has the right to assume if no negative feedback is received within a reasonable timeframe that the sale is completed to the buyer's satisfaction. In business, a timeframe is normally stated and agreed upon prior to the receipt of the product. In a private sale, the formality of a written contract is not likely, and both parties by not stating conditions of sale, are actually implying them. Reason allows for a couple of weeks for the buyer to ensure that the product is worthy of use and as described during the transaction. This puts the onus on the buyer to inspect the product and either accept or decline it based on condition.

To me, it seems that superdart maybe has little or limited knowledge of what constitutes serious damage to an aluminum intake, found out long after the fact that it is seriously flawed, and now is trying to receive a refund.

Unfortunately, the onus was on him to inspect the product within a reasonable time frame, and he did not.

Regardless of condition of product, omission of full disclosure on part condition, knowledge of said defect, the transaction is complete.

Caveat emptor

Grant