too mild camshaft

fishy68, the duration (amount of time that the lobe lifts the lifter, measured in degrees) is not effected by the rocker ratio.

Of course it's not. I never said it did.
The "duration" is simply a measurement of where lift starts and ends, not how much.

Yes that's right. But it is a measurement taken at the valve, not the cam lobe.
The "duration at .050" will change slightly because the rocker has a higher ratio and will have the valve open a little bit further, faster. Duration at .050" lift is a tool (so to speak) to give you an idea of how aggressive the cam lobe is.

Understood, although I'm not sure calling it a tool is correct since it's a rating just like total duration except it's more precise
The "advertised duration" is the actual duration of the cam.
The "duration" will remain the same while the lift increases across the board.

Here is where the problem lies. It is the duration at valve lift. Not at the cam lobe.
In other words, the duration of the cam does not change, the amount of lift does.

Yes the cam duration doesn't change. The advertised duration is the amount of duration at the valve at a certain lift. Some mfg.s spec it at .004 lift and some at .006 and others at .008.With that in mind the valve duration is changed even if it is a small amount. I know this positively because I did some testing recently with 1.5 ratio rockers and 1.6 rockers and with the 1.6 rockers the valve duration was increased.

So to reiterate I fully understand that different ratio rocker arms don't affect lobe duration. But they do affect valve duration (even if it is only 2-3 degrees) and that is all that matters.

This has gotten way off subject from the OP so this is my last post on it. Sorry to muddle up things with technicalities Nokke.