Search results for query: *

I spotted you there, as I was driving to the staging lanes, but I missed out on the chance of chatting it up... Huge showing of race cars. Too many. I don't understand the decision to double up on events.. other than $$$

ok...

Timing cover for 318, 340, 360 (used 69-73) Machined flat, some erosion in pump cavity but, not bad. see pics $80 plus $18 shipping in the US, or pick up in CA central valley.

Early '68 340 production timing cover. Requires sheet metal timing tab, that I do not have. Machined flat and it excellent condition ! like new , see pics $130 plus $18 shipping to US address I'm in CA central valley if you want to pick up.

Especially him. takes forever to make a weak point, and works in filth. Too distracted in plugging up his bench with Dikem and taking velocity numbers on a preliminary test. I don't have the patience for it.

I disagree about staying on the shelf... they need to be thrown back into the crucible, and start OVER. :)

That's how they were advertised, for sure. Port and chamber shape were OEM magnum only with larger ports. By how much, I don't recall. I do remember however, that dog leg at the bottom of the turn wall enabled some handsome flow numbers in the mid lifts. The RHSs were virtually identical. I...

There ya go John! I was wondering why you fixed those factory issues, per gratis. It's not your fault the manufacturer can't get it right. (I know, cause you're a good man ) I had an old friend bring me some Edelbrokes, and when I informed him of the problems, he wasn't happy. But he was...

Thanks for mentioning my thread.. It seems internet forums has just as short of a memory as an old magazine 40 years ago.. No matter how much work you put into it. Few actually do any research to summarily answer their own questions. As far as Weingartner's experiment, (something I/we...

Your inbox is full

text sent and PM'd

ok

YES

Ok, $2300 ? offers anyone?

Turlock (but I wouldn't want admin to think I'm bumping) :(

I saved these from a very dusty existence ! Believed to be 2nd production run of W2's. Ported by Ryan. (advertised at 320cfm) Chambers were plunged for piston clearance. 2.08/1.60 5.312 OAL PAC Beehives (1255x) installed at 1.850 180# seat / 430# open (.600) Comp 10° Retainers Crower...

If you're looking for some aluminum Batten W2's, I've got good news, and bad news. Good news is, I have one. Bad news is, I have ONE. I don't have any history on this head, as I obtained it through some horse trading. They are Ported. I would estimate them to go over 340 cfm with ease...

lol that was back when the cam grinders used to name their cams.. Crower Monarch, Crane Hydraulic Hauler, or Blazer. I can't remember what Isky named that one you had... but it was definitely a few steps up from the Mile-a-more! lol BTW, glad to see you came around to the Mopar fold :thumbsup:

Smart move on the 6.4 intake.. In the midst of scores of flow tests I've done on the Eagles (and pre-Eagles), is running engine combos on my dyno software.. What I've found, was that the OEM - long runner manifolds, is what made the difference in keeping the torque/HP curve under 6200 rpm...

Yes, 63 and 64 are the same. VFN Fiberglass makes a very nice pin on for $530 (?) It has webbing underneath much like the OE hood I pinned mine in the front and added bosses for the hinges in the rear.

Please share it, if you find it. Some of this stuff is like finding fly **** in pepper.. Are you using a 'truck' timing cover on your build?

It's a shame, isn't it? ...and it doesn't (shouldn't) have to be this way. "don't confuse me with the facts" has become the mantra that allows many of these shows to flourish.

Well, right on! I would love to see some honesty in a direct comparo like that, instead of the usual one sided crap. What do you think? the Mopar has the widest Int manifold of the 3. That makes for longer runners for higher torque levels. There's been much discussion about rod ratio's, and...

Well, I did feel a little canceled... But, I do accept what you had to say. It's been a year since I've seen the episode I'm about to refer to.. I'm probably going to have to find it.. One time in particular, Holdener did a mopar, phord, shivi SB shootout, of sorts. First off, there was...

Well, it's not just the lobe centers. It's the cam as a whole. Lobe profiles are different, on the Int but especially the exh. I'm speaking differences the cam card doesn't show. Also too, Holdener has decent content, but he leaves import particulars out... the stuff almost everyone misses...

Well, when it comes to the application of most any source of boost, the dynamics that effect a NA motor goes sailing out the passenger window. Things like tuning effects of intake manifold runner length, or even Exh primary tube length become inconsequential. Also too, the flow dynamics of...

I'm going to be doing some flow testing on a pre-Eagle head next week sometime.. The plan is to use the OE Eagle 2.05 valves. Mainly cause they're cheap to get and an upgrade, but that's why I'm doing it. The Exh pic is for the Eagle only. the Pre-Eagle Exh ports are very different..

The springs are PAC 1219X Pull offs from Edelbrock Hemi heads. NEVER RUN inspect pics (no wear marks) Summit sells for $286 Full specs on paper in pic. (don't hurt yourself) $150 shipped from 95380

lol glad to help

The Exh ports are less than impressive, for sure. But I refuse to throw the baby out with the bath water. What they come down to is, grind out to the gasket (top arc only) but leave the bottom as is.(size wise) And then grind accordingly on the roof to blend into that new size. (make sense? )...