Search results for query: *

Makes sense to me, and the mixture velocity should still be high since most of the travel is in the tight confines of the intake runners, but probably choked a bit because of the smaller runners. But I'm not an engine builder, maybe an engine assembler at best!

Maybe the FABO engine gurus can answer this question... if the cylinder head ports are larger than the intake manifold ports, like is showing in Steve's post #60 in this thread, is it really that big of a deal? I mean, obviously having the intake and head ports match would be better, but with...

I was thinking about getting one of these Part #14x3@110 for my 70 Swinger, then running some hoses to the holes in the hood. Or maybe just a couple of plastic elbows, depending on the location. I would have to measure to figure out the best option. Models of Ram Air Box

Yup, saw that same thing. Work is it worked pretty well.

Up here in the great white north our 87 and 89 octane has "up to 10%" ethanol, but the high test (91 and above) has no ethanol. For me, if I'm going to use the gas relatively soon I'll just buy the cheap stuff. I run the 87 octane at normal fill-ups, but when I'm putting the car away for the...

Yeah, I was kind of thinking the same thing. I guess I needed to hear it from someone else. Thanks guys.

Hey guys, Looking for some opinions from the Mopar masters. Here's the car: 70 Dart with a 318, LD340, stock small valve 360 heads, Comp XE-262 cam, 904 with a stage 1 shift kit and a mild stall converter. Rear is a 8.75 running 3.23 posi (LOL, just kidding, it's a 3.23 sure-grip. I...