Search results for query: *

Great post @AJ/FormS

I’d save it for a rear end oil change since it has listed on it “Contains limited slip additive.”

I think the confusion comes in when the factory service manuals suggest gear oil in one book and ATF in another.

And then they try to pick you up for a drink

Can’t you take an earlier pedal set up from a B body, like a ‘73/‘74 and use those? I thought that was the case.

I had a 318-3spd Duster with the low 3.08 first gear between the bucket seats and 3.21’s out back. *I think* it was a ‘73. Also having a moon roof and fold down rear seat. It was pretty peppy off the line for a bone stock 318.

My son took the stick real quick. He loves it.

Absolutely! Coupled with the amount of torque from the engine… LOL! What would you suggest for a SLR on a manual?

3.23 X 3.09 = 9.98 That’s about optimal for a first year take off. 2.94 X 3.09 = 9.08. Still not to shabby. It’ll still have a decent off the line acceleration and it’ll have a good Hwy cruise rpm. A pretty good balance IMO.

3.09 for sure. Multiply the gear ratio by the first gear ratio. The target sum should be as close to 10.00 as possible for arguably the best take off ratio. 2.44 X 2.94 = 7.17 - Not to great. 2.66 X 2.94 = 7.82 - An improvement, not so great though. 3.09 X 2.94 = 9.08 - Getting pretty nice...

The ❌ first s simply stated as “Disagree.” Nothing more, nothing less. If it’s more than that to anyone, you might have a slight problem and disillusion. Perhaps something more mentally. I think everyone needs to relax a bit here on this thread. Enjoy the day fellas.

Spring perches, they will fold up I see a lot of power, weld in gussets. Sheet metal at the front spring hanger area can be ripped up and out under (serious) power. U joints, driveshaft. I wouldn’t run an adapter for the trunnion. I’d run a standard yoke of a 7290 at a min.

That’s bad ***!

GRANT! 1st up! Congratulations! 2nd, I was about to ask where you have been but I guess that’s obvious now. Busy racing!

Internally balanced, yes, it’ll work! Well thanks to @skep419 !!!!! Now we know. Thanks my friend! :thankyou: Wooooo hooo! Magnum weight ordered.

What do you do for a stock engine, 5.9 flywheel?

Locking pawl inside the trans?

I can not answer the question but…… A 3.0 from a Chrysler? What year, make & model did it come out of?

FWIW, I’d go with Liberty.

Yes sir that’s correct. The high rpm will expose any weakness brought on by the high shock loads of the manual trans. At his listed 6600, I wouldn’t worry about it coming loose but I’d run a scatter shield.

Seems to me you know more than I do about this. I’ve never done pedal swaps before. I’ve only had 1 Duster and 1 E body ‘Cuda with pedals and they never left the car.

That’s what I was wondering. Hey slantsixDan, at the threat of a thread hijacking….. Will B body 72-74 4 spd pedal work in a 78-79 B body?

@Dartnut Thats what I was thinking. Nothing a sawzall and a welder can’t fix! HA HA HA But that’s probably more of a PIA than anything making it more or less not a great thing to do. @GTX JOHN What year B body pedals do you have?

Is there a ratio difference?

It’s a PIA sometimes. All the time for me….

Mmmmmmmmm, Tasty! Interesting Alt. bracket. Nice work on the throttle bracket. Looks great under there. Thanks

Can I get an photo under the hood please?

Ops, sorry about that. My bad!

I have never heard or seen a MP rear end stamped or offered with a 3.45 ratio. 3.55? Yes!

@plumkrazee70 , What was the bill on that beast?