Airflow to Cubic Inches

-
Here's A 493 270 Trick Flow making 788 hp at 6300 rpm and 710 tq at 5400 rpm.

 
TF270’s are the default head choice for that type of build.

Uses std offset rockers and has std height ex ports.
Indy EZ295 is basically the equivalent.
 
PHR said it best above. The formula for getting the max and beyond are one thing, and average hot rodders just need to look at what others have done and do a basic copy of it.

This is where I see so many people use a formula and get pissed at the results and why I say formulas don’t work well and are not for everyday or even pretty hot builds. People get lost in them and choose based on what the math says only to be disappointed.

The only time I see people happy with the math is when they’re building a very specific certain something to do a specific strain something. By the standards of this forums routine chatter, this would be the extreme end are really hot engines.

If off the shelf parts can do the trick, you really don’t need the math.
 
PHR said it best above. The formula for getting the max and beyond are one thing, and average hot rodders just need to look at what others have done and do a basic copy of it.

This is where I see so many people use a formula and get pissed at the results and why I say formulas don’t work well and are not for everyday or even pretty hot builds. People get lost in them and choose based on what the math says only to be disappointed.

The only time I see people happy with the math is when they’re building a very specific certain something to do a specific strain something. By the standards of this forums routine chatter, this would be the extreme end are really hot engines.

If off the shelf parts can do the trick, you really don’t need the math.
Also u have to realize the machine work that goes into this type engine. These are the results u get with a high end pro engine builder. Like the old saying goes: u wanna play u gotta pay. Kim
 
I don't know the intake port lengths or volumes on the B1 heads but in my opinion for a 493 running to 6200 you're going to have a hard time beating the TF270
 
Also u have to realize the machine work that goes into this type engine. These are the results u get with a high end pro engine builder. Like the old saying goes: u wanna play u gotta pay. Kim
Very true. There are in my head “Levels” if you all get the drift.
Stock rebuild
High performance
Race

This applies to the parts and combinations used. OEM parts can go far. (Totally subjective) Then there are HP parts and race parts as well as machining.
 
From Darin Morgan's induction seminars, he uses the equation above^^^^^for the cfm demand at max piston speed, which occurs approx 75 degrees ATDC. For average CFM demand he uses the same equation multiplied by 0.6872.
Darin's talking actual airflow demand in a running engine and they're talking what they see on a flow bench, 2 totally different worlds.
 
Yeah but what do 318 heads flow after Uncle Tony gets done with his HF grinder...? :lol: :poke:
A quick bowl and short side job like he did could be in the 210 area easy. The heads don’t flow much as cast but do respond well to some work.
 
Darin's talking actual airflow demand in a running engine and they're talking what they see on a flow bench, 2 totally different worlds.
I don't see that calculating an actual displacement of air over time. It calculates estimated cfm at 28" which is airflow on a bench. cid x ve% x rpm / 3456 = cfm calculates a close approximation to actual volume of air used/needed.
 
A quick bowl and short side job like he did could be in the 210 area easy. The heads don’t flow much as cast but do respond well to some work.
And get rid of that God awfully large 3/8 valve size and use an 11/32 or even 8mm valve and that goes for all the OEM heads.
 
I don't see that calculating an actual displacement of air over time. It calculates estimated cfm at 28" which is airflow on a bench. cid x ve% x rpm / 3456 = cfm calculates a close approximation to actual volume of air used/needed.
I wonder how many people put a 250 cfm head on a small block and wonder why it never made 500Hp. Just because you build it doesn't mean it will make it.

A head will only flow what the subsequent engine below it demands. More head flow doesn't make an engine efficient.
 
I wonder how many people put a 250 cfm head on a small block and wonder why it never made 500Hp. Just because you build it doesn't mean it will make it.

A head will only flow what the subsequent engine below it demands. More head flow doesn't make an engine efficient.
Never said it did, just that calculation suppose to predict flow bench cfm reading needed not actual physical amount of air in cfm.
 
A head will only flow what the subsequent engine below it demands. More head flow doesn't make an engine efficient.
Please explain, are you saying changing only the cylinder heads won't make an engine more efficient.
 
What he's saying is regardless of how much food is on the table a person can only eat so much.
 
What he's saying is regardless of how much food is on the table a person can only eat so much.
That's a great analogy :thumbsup:


Please explain, are you saying changing only the cylinder heads won't make an engine more efficient.
Piston demand and piston speed is what fills the cylinder not the heads ability flow. Like I've pointed out earlier static flow on a flow bench is not representative of what happens in a real running engine.
 
Piston demand and piston speed is what fills the cylinder not the heads ability flow. Like I've pointed out earlier static flow on a flow bench is not representative of what happens in a real running engine.
Well, that's a good way not answering the question.
 
Well, that's a good way not answering the question.
You need some one to explain to you why a 300 cfm W2 head will make very little torque in a 273?

What's the piston demand and peak piston speed of that little bore and little stroke?
 
Here watch this:



Improving cylinder fill improves power.......Piston speed, Rod Length and Stroke and Bore Size all affect the cylinders ability to fill. The bigger the port and intake valve the easier it is for the exhaust to travel up the intake tract PREVENTING cylinder fill when the intake valve opens.
 
Last edited:
-
Back
Top