This is what your LS masturbates to in the bathroom…
Also u have to realize the machine work that goes into this type engine. These are the results u get with a high end pro engine builder. Like the old saying goes: u wanna play u gotta pay. KimPHR said it best above. The formula for getting the max and beyond are one thing, and average hot rodders just need to look at what others have done and do a basic copy of it.
This is where I see so many people use a formula and get pissed at the results and why I say formulas don’t work well and are not for everyday or even pretty hot builds. People get lost in them and choose based on what the math says only to be disappointed.
The only time I see people happy with the math is when they’re building a very specific certain something to do a specific strain something. By the standards of this forums routine chatter, this would be the extreme end are really hot engines.
If off the shelf parts can do the trick, you really don’t need the math.
Very true. There are in my head “Levels” if you all get the drift.Also u have to realize the machine work that goes into this type engine. These are the results u get with a high end pro engine builder. Like the old saying goes: u wanna play u gotta pay. Kim
Please tell us about your build.The SBM I had on the dyno this spring did 2hp per cfm… but it had a stout camshaft…
Darin's talking actual airflow demand in a running engine and they're talking what they see on a flow bench, 2 totally different worlds.From Darin Morgan's induction seminars, he uses the equation above^^^^^for the cfm demand at max piston speed, which occurs approx 75 degrees ATDC. For average CFM demand he uses the same equation multiplied by 0.6872.
A quick bowl and short side job like he did could be in the 210 area easy. The heads don’t flow much as cast but do respond well to some work.Yeah but what do 318 heads flow after Uncle Tony gets done with his HF grinder...?
I don't see that calculating an actual displacement of air over time. It calculates estimated cfm at 28" which is airflow on a bench. cid x ve% x rpm / 3456 = cfm calculates a close approximation to actual volume of air used/needed.Darin's talking actual airflow demand in a running engine and they're talking what they see on a flow bench, 2 totally different worlds.
And get rid of that God awfully large 3/8 valve size and use an 11/32 or even 8mm valve and that goes for all the OEM heads.A quick bowl and short side job like he did could be in the 210 area easy. The heads don’t flow much as cast but do respond well to some work.
I wonder how many people put a 250 cfm head on a small block and wonder why it never made 500Hp. Just because you build it doesn't mean it will make it.I don't see that calculating an actual displacement of air over time. It calculates estimated cfm at 28" which is airflow on a bench. cid x ve% x rpm / 3456 = cfm calculates a close approximation to actual volume of air used/needed.
Never said it did, just that calculation suppose to predict flow bench cfm reading needed not actual physical amount of air in cfm.I wonder how many people put a 250 cfm head on a small block and wonder why it never made 500Hp. Just because you build it doesn't mean it will make it.
A head will only flow what the subsequent engine below it demands. More head flow doesn't make an engine efficient.
Bingo!More head flow doesn't make an engine efficient.
Please explain, are you saying changing only the cylinder heads won't make an engine more efficient.A head will only flow what the subsequent engine below it demands. More head flow doesn't make an engine efficient.
Difference is were talking over time (rpm) not just one sitting (cid x ve%).What he's saying is regardless of how much food is on the table a person can only eat so much.
At full throttle (demand) you only run out of supplyThe supply and demand have to match
That's a great analogyWhat he's saying is regardless of how much food is on the table a person can only eat so much.
Piston demand and piston speed is what fills the cylinder not the heads ability flow. Like I've pointed out earlier static flow on a flow bench is not representative of what happens in a real running engine.Please explain, are you saying changing only the cylinder heads won't make an engine more efficient.
Well, that's a good way not answering the question.Piston demand and piston speed is what fills the cylinder not the heads ability flow. Like I've pointed out earlier static flow on a flow bench is not representative of what happens in a real running engine.
You need some one to explain to you why a 300 cfm W2 head will make very little torque in a 273?Well, that's a good way not answering the question.