hula
Well-Known Member
I'm doing the front end so might as well do brakes. So any advice on rotors, pad, calipers is welcomed.
I'm curious. There were different ones over the years. Which ones do you have?If it is a factory four-piston caliper DISC BRAKE CAR -- you would be BEST - ADVISED to find N.O.S. ++ Asbestos ++ Brake Pads ---
Outlawed now thanks to E.P.A> -- but still the SMOOOOOOOOOOOthest Braking System known to mankind,............
Fortunately for you, I have a couple sets of N.O.S. ++ Asbestos ++ at this moment in time..............
I generally agree. I'll quibble on what type of material stops a car 'better'. Because in general I do agree that 'semi-metallics' tend to be a good choice for these cars andThere's a reason asbestos brake pads went away. Notice that "auto mechanic" and exposure to dust is mentioned specifically for risks/causes of mesothelioma. It wasn't "tree hugger" BS that drove out asbestos brake pads, it was thousands of people in industry dying of cancer.
Mesothelioma - Symptoms and causes
And if you're too afraid of wearing out your rotors with semi-metallic pads, which will stop the car better anyway, then maybe just stop driving the car altogether and park it in a museum. Brake rotors wear out, that's what they're designed to do. The more aggressive the pad material is, the faster your car stops and the faster the rotors wear out.
So, it's really just a matter of whether you'd rather stop your car faster or wear out your rotors slower. Saving your rotors will seem pretty silly if you get in an accident because you didn't stop fast enough. If you drive the car, wearing out brake rotors is just part of the game.
Please answer my question.EXXXXXXXXXXACTLY.............. That's why I canvass the Universe to find ++ N.O.S. ++ Asbestos ++ Brake Pads & Shoes ---
in the Mopar World, the GM world, the Ford World, the Rambler world, the Studebaker world, etc., etc. !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I generally agree. I'll quibble on what type of material stops a car 'better'. Because in general I do agree that 'semi-metallics' tend to be a good choice for these cars and
my only quibble is that's gross simplification.
I hear you. I get it. And knew you understand there are many differences etc, that's why I said I generally agree. I don't know if a generalization can be made about OEM linings, that's why I'm curious about what he has. I have an opinion about the linings I pictured, and you may already know it since you've seen my posts hear and on moparts. But right now I'd just like @mobileparts to show what he has, if anything. I asked as a matter of historical interest. I looked - he did post in the sale section - like 4 or 5 years ago, I'm trying to give him the benefit of the doubt.Oh of course, there are a lot of different pad compounds and manufacturers out there and how well they work on a specific car depends a lot on the use of the vehicle. There are pads for race use that will stop the car amazingly well when they’re hot, but don’t work well at all cold, so despite their race pedigree they’re a terrible choice for a street car. But on the street the general category of “semi-metallic” pads work quite well.
Saying the factory pads work better than what’s available in the aftermarket now is complete folly. Not only is the asbestos dangerous to your health, there are far better options available.
The member posting about his NOS pads pretty much just spams brake threads trying to sell his stuff. Other than arguing with me about the false claims he’s making about the performance of the original pads, pretty much all of his posts are an attempt to sell his parts. Honestly he should probably be required to have vendor status the way he posts, but that’s just my opinion.