hmmm so the range given was 160-200 on seat, >400 on open, youre saying I should be in the 240 range and 600? for this cam profile
Yes.
Like I said, with a .904 lifter I’m running that spring load on my SFT cam.
The cam is out now, and if I was home I’d take a picture of what 35 pulls on the dyno looks like.
It looks perfect.
Schneider and anyone else saying to use that little spring load on a solid roller lobe is just wrong.
I’ve got decades correcting that error. In fact, I started machining and building my own **** in 1989 because the machinist I used was such a prick about the spring I wanted to use that I fired him and did it myself.
I would have made far more money not being a machinist, but it was that big of a deal.
And here is the irony of it all.
I told him to buy a spring that would have been 260 on the seat and 6XX over the nose, and he ignored me and bought a spring that was 185 on the seat and 440 over the nose.
That was early 1989. We are 36 years past that insanity and the lie lives on.
Also of note, once I figured out the junk lifters (that would be any roller lifter with a .750 diameter wheel) I could run the engine to 8500 and when I felt froggy I’d shift at 9000.
The reason the cheap lifters have a .750 wheel is…wait for it…and…its because that’s the biggest wheel you can fit in the skimpy assed GM .842 lifter body.
That’s fact.
There is no reason to run a wheel that small.
Spend wisely. Stepping over a donut to grab a dog turd never saves money in the long run run.
And I know guys will say they’ve been running .750 wheels and 160 on the seat for 900,000 miles and never had a failure.
I don’t buy it.