Im not a pro bodyman but I like to have some kind of primer under my filler. It is an extra step and a waste of product seeing that you will sand some of it off but I like the peice of mind knowing that the metal is protected. Time is money to a bodyshop and extra product sanded off into dust cuts into profit thats why most pros don't do it like this. If the car will never see salt or rain then you can probably fill over bare metal, just make sure moisture can't get behind the filler.
I like this statement. I feel the need to ask what I feel is a reasonable question about this statement since I've heard it so much.
Let's say you don't prime under the filler, okay. But the metal is clean and well etched, say with a grinder disk, acid etch, sand scratches from the DA, whatever. You've done your filler work and now lay down a bare metal resistant surfacer. Okay, let's say you laid down a bare metal primer, then went to surfacer. You've done your block work, now you put sealer on it, color, then clear. So, with today's improved fillers (not cheap *** Bondo, but something
good) we need to concern ourselves with moisture going though the clear, the color, the sealer, the surfacer, the bare metal primer of your choice, eating through the filler then attacking the bare metal underneath? Then why don't we need to worry about the moisture going through all those same layers of paint and primer and attacking the rest of the bare metal underneath all those paint layers on the whole car where there's no filler?
I'm not saying that using primer under the bone is right or wrong. Like I've stated before in this thread, you'll hear different answers from experienced guys who rely on experience and preference. I just want someone to explain to me how the moisture is going to make it's way through all the paint and primer above the filler and not on the rest of the car.