Looking for my Duster's fender tag and original 225 engine.

-

cruiser

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 26, 2016
Messages
814
Reaction score
905
Location
Bloomington, MN
Looking for the missing fender tag for my 1974 Duster , VIN VL29C4G129869.
Also looking for the original motor, a 1974 slant six with the above VIN stamped on it.
Any and all leads welcome. Both are probably somewhere in the Portland OR area.
Finder's reward will be paid! Thanks.
 
I have a 74 /6 but the numbers are now painted over....and weren't stamped very well to begin with. The other numbers by the #1 cylinder were obliterated by way of the block shave I had done. engine came from Indy area, now in Illinois.
 
I thought your car was original.
Rusty: My car has been restored to original condition, but the engine is not the numbers matching motor from the factory. My FABO opening page, which describes the story of my Duster, refers to the non-original engine. I posted a notice in a FABO forum in February of 2021 describing my search for the original motor, and I also described my existing engine in a 2020 post about 225 engine identification characteristics. I'm very fortunate in that the original purchaser of the car is still alive. In fact, I had a long chat with him about the history of the car to include the engine replacement in 1988. I captured this chat on video and have watched it several times since it was filmed in April of 2019. The factory motor was burning a lot of oil by 1988, and Ray (the original owner) had it replaced with a parts store short block. All of the engine accessories were transferred to the short block, and the car was soon back on the road. The motor that went in was a May of 1974 casting date engine that came out of another A body car prior to being remanufactured. So my engine has the correct casting number, with the more desirable forged crank. Ray doesn't know what happened to the original engine after it was removed. He searched around his sources in Portland, but simply couldn't locate it. It may still be out there, hence my recent ad offering a reward for its return. When I bought my Duster in April of 2019, the replacement engine had the incorrect "peanut" head on it. I located a really nice, correct head and have installed it on my motor, along with restoring all of the correct underhood components to fall of 1973 standards. So my engine looks exactly correct, and you'd only know that its not the factory motor by examining the VIN stamped at the right rear of the block. The A-904 tranny is the numbers matching original. Final note: Ray has since told me that if he had to do it over again, that he would have kept the original motor and rebuilt it instead of installing a replacement motor. Thanks as always for your support and your interest in my car. Its much appreciated!
 
While I understand why you're wanting "that" engine it isn't a 340 or hemi, etc so at the end of the day, having "that" engine won't make the car worth any more. On the peanut vs drool tube head deal again I get it .. but the peanut plug head wins for me if only because of having 6 less potential oil leaks vs a drool tube head.
 
While I understand why you're wanting "that" engine it isn't a 340 or hemi, etc so at the end of the day, having "that" engine won't make the car worth any more. On the peanut vs drool tube head deal again I get it .. but the peanut plug head wins for me if only because of having 6 less potential oil leaks vs a drool tube head.
Yes, that's a good point about fewer oil leaks on the peanut head. I'm not even sure why they went to the different head design in 1975.
 
Rusty: My car has been restored to original condition, but the engine is not the numbers matching motor from the factory. My FABO opening page, which describes the story of my Duster, refers to the non-original engine. I posted a notice in a FABO forum in February of 2021 describing my search for the original motor, and I also described my existing engine in a 2020 post about 225 engine identification characteristics. I'm very fortunate in that the original purchaser of the car is still alive. In fact, I had a long chat with him about the history of the car to include the engine replacement in 1988. I captured this chat on video and have watched it several times since it was filmed in April of 2019. The factory motor was burning a lot of oil by 1988, and Ray (the original owner) had it replaced with a parts store short block. All of the engine accessories were transferred to the short block, and the car was soon back on the road. The motor that went in was a May of 1974 casting date engine that came out of another A body car prior to being remanufactured. So my engine has the correct casting number, with the more desirable forged crank. Ray doesn't know what happened to the original engine after it was removed. He searched around his sources in Portland, but simply couldn't locate it. It may still be out there, hence my recent ad offering a reward for its return. When I bought my Duster in April of 2019, the replacement engine had the incorrect "peanut" head on it. I located a really nice, correct head and have installed it on my motor, along with restoring all of the correct underhood components to fall of 1973 standards. So my engine looks exactly correct, and you'd only know that its not the factory motor by examining the VIN stamped at the right rear of the block. The A-904 tranny is the numbers matching original. Final note: Ray has since told me that if he had to do it over again, that he would have kept the original motor and rebuilt it instead of installing a replacement motor. Thanks as always for your support and your interest in my car. Its much appreciated!
I see. I musta missed that somehow. I have a few 225s. I doubt it wouldda made it to Georgia, but you never know. I'll look when I get a minute.
 
Yes, that's a good point about fewer oil leaks on the peanut head. I'm not even sure why they went to the different head design in 1975.
I believe it was to prevent oil leaks. hardly anyone ever replaced the spark plug tube o-rings as needed, so they hardened and leaked.
 
-
Back
Top