GaryS
Well-Known Member
My family and I owned several slants from 1960 on, and I worked at a C-P dealer in sales in 1964, where I drove countless slant sixes, both automatic and manual, and in all body styles. I've always carried a log book and calculated mileage for the entire time I owned the car.
Real world combined driving when the slants were new was about 18-22, and the body style didn't make much difference. Hiway driving got about two miles more. The best slant I drove for mileage was my dad's '61 Savoy, 225 auto. I would get an honest, measured 26 on trips, and don't remember it ever getting lower than 18.
My '63 Valiant would get 25, and my current '64 convertible has a best of 21 and a combined average of 18. Worst slant I owned was a '75 Valiant that got between 15 and 17 combined, and it was a gutless wonder.
If 1960s real gas was more available today, you could expect 10% better. I owned the '75 during the time ethanol was only required in winter in my state, so mileage dropped 10% when the switch from summer gas was made, and increased the same amount when seasons switched again.
Real world combined driving when the slants were new was about 18-22, and the body style didn't make much difference. Hiway driving got about two miles more. The best slant I drove for mileage was my dad's '61 Savoy, 225 auto. I would get an honest, measured 26 on trips, and don't remember it ever getting lower than 18.
My '63 Valiant would get 25, and my current '64 convertible has a best of 21 and a combined average of 18. Worst slant I owned was a '75 Valiant that got between 15 and 17 combined, and it was a gutless wonder.
If 1960s real gas was more available today, you could expect 10% better. I owned the '75 during the time ethanol was only required in winter in my state, so mileage dropped 10% when the switch from summer gas was made, and increased the same amount when seasons switched again.