7 72golddustermike Well-Known Member Joined Oct 13, 2010 Messages 436 Reaction score 71 Location northeast arkansas Mar 9, 2016 #1 View attachment IMG_1170.jpg View attachment IMG_1175.jpg View attachment IMG_1178.jpg View attachment IMG_1179.jpg View attachment IMG_1182.jpg View attachment IMG_1185.jpg View attachment IMG_1186.jpg View attachment IMG_1189.jpg View attachment IMG_1191.jpg View attachment IMG_1195.jpg
View attachment IMG_1170.jpg View attachment IMG_1175.jpg View attachment IMG_1178.jpg View attachment IMG_1179.jpg View attachment IMG_1182.jpg View attachment IMG_1185.jpg View attachment IMG_1186.jpg View attachment IMG_1189.jpg View attachment IMG_1191.jpg View attachment IMG_1195.jpg
375inStroke Well-Known Member Joined Nov 27, 2006 Messages 2,937 Reaction score 368 Location Seattle, WA Mar 9, 2016 #2 Don't look that bad to me. The grounds look better than the electrodes, so they could be on the cold side. What number are they?
Don't look that bad to me. The grounds look better than the electrodes, so they could be on the cold side. What number are they?
YY1 Well-Known Member Joined Oct 11, 2011 Messages 11,907 Reaction score 8,465 Location FL Mar 10, 2016 #3 Slightly carbon-y. Cold or slightly rich?
halifaxhops It's going to get stupid around here! FABO Gold Member Joined Jan 20, 2014 Messages 87,783 Reaction score 68,489 Location Hoppyworld, PA Mar 10, 2016 #4 Might be a tad rich.
B bOb shingler Well-Known Member Joined Jun 8, 2007 Messages 3,266 Reaction score 287 Location warrenton, north carolina Mar 10, 2016 #5 still looks like crap
roccodart440 Well-Known Member Joined Apr 19, 2010 Messages 6,812 Reaction score 3,595 Mar 10, 2016 #6 Looks really inconsistent to me. That's my primary concern. Second is the carbon. seems excessive.