Guys - Maybe a dumb thing to ask, but is there any "standards" on vehicle stance? What I mean is, I like a car to have just a skosh of elevation to the rear … but not much.
I seriously DO NOT LIKE when a vehicle looks high in the front. Like some 60's Moustangs. Some of those cars ride down the road like a boat in a 'No Wake' zone. It looks awful. And some pick-up trucks that have a "leveling kit" look anything but level to me. Too high looking in the front.
I think it looks best when the rear has a reasonable ride height, and the front is just a skosh low. It just looks mean. The Scamp came to me with air shocks, so I can adjust the rear ride height to some degree.
The Scamp is looking a bit too level, so before I go to messing with it, I'm wondering if it has ever been "defined" as to how much angle, front to rear, looks best. Thanks.
7milesout
I seriously DO NOT LIKE when a vehicle looks high in the front. Like some 60's Moustangs. Some of those cars ride down the road like a boat in a 'No Wake' zone. It looks awful. And some pick-up trucks that have a "leveling kit" look anything but level to me. Too high looking in the front.
I think it looks best when the rear has a reasonable ride height, and the front is just a skosh low. It just looks mean. The Scamp came to me with air shocks, so I can adjust the rear ride height to some degree.
The Scamp is looking a bit too level, so before I go to messing with it, I'm wondering if it has ever been "defined" as to how much angle, front to rear, looks best. Thanks.
7milesout