Do you have any evidence that the stud in the motor mount is grade 5? It is not a bolt, it is a metal stud welded to a flat piece of metal. Is the plate grade 5 also?Carriage Bolt is not grade 5, the minimum
strength automotive bolt for any application under
Carraige bolts are Hardware Grade, Grade 2 or softer and Grade 5 is the minimum strength Automotive fastener for ' High Stress' applications. You can tell the difference by using a fine file & cutting a small slot with Corner of File. Grade 8 is usually the hardest(some Aircraft & Specialty are harder)
I would bet the stud you cut out of new mount was Grade 8, so you've effectively made that mount weaker, and under tension that Carriage Bolt WILL stretch and eventually fail, so you had better run a Torque Strap or you'll get a big surprise.
All you saw years ago was a piece of chain, every Hot Car had them then.
Also saw that Rod End in a post & that style rod end notoriously weak, look at top of it in pic, not much metal above sphere of joint. Seen those break & might be engineered to break for certain reasons. The Clevis style on the bottom is bullet proof. I'd bet he used that cheap rod end to help alignment. Better to use Clevis & space it properly.
Or Old School Era Correct
I would generally agree with you on grade 5. However you do not seem to have any evidence to back up your specific assertions.
The failure mechanism I have observed is the rubber isolator delaminating from the metal plate. The chain does not solve the problem of the mount failing, it just keeps the engine from moving a lot when the mount fails. The engine can still change position with a broken mount.

















