72scampguy
Well-Known Member
Anyone running 3.5"exhaust? My headers are 3.5 collector. Anyone make a mandrel bent x pipe for this or you think i should put cutouts on it and then run 3" on the rest.
432 cid. Looking to get 650 to 700 hp on dyno next weak. Small block.3" exhaust is heavy 3.5 even more so, how much power do you have, how mutch CID?
Anyone running 3.5"exhaust? My headers are 3.5 collector. Anyone make a mandrel bent x pipe for this or you think i should put cutouts on it and then run 3" on the rest.
STREETCAR . Why kill power to change size ? up or down .Why not 4 inch?
LolI heard the new Mustangs have 5 inch.
If you are still considering the 3.5" X, I can give you a special member price.
3.5" X-Pipe Crossover Universal Kit XVA14
432 cid. Looking to get 650 to 700 hp on dyno next weak. Small block.
That's certainly a consideration. Performance wise, several years ago we ran a test on a 400hp car with our 2.5" X connected to LT headers and then ran the same exact test with the X-pipe removed. The car dyno'd 10 extra hp to the wheels with the X-pipe on and nothing behind it! So in theory, you might add weight but you might still pickup a little extra in the quarter mile.I have thot about it , but think it would just be extra weight in my case .
Thanks for the offer. I will be calling you when the time comes. Gotta get that motor off the dyno and in the car first..That's certainly a consideration. Performance wise, several years ago we ran a test on a 400hp car with our 2.5" X connected to LT headers and then ran the same exact test with the X-pipe removed. The car dyno'd 10 extra hp to the wheels with the X-pipe on and nothing behind it! So in theory, you might add weight but you might still pickup a little extra in the quarter mile.
That being said, with X-pipes, there comes a point with really big motors where they may not increase your hp. We never tested a 3.5" X versus open headers. Some guys swear they work and some guys buy them strictly because of reduced decibels.
Not yet. Brian at imm doing it up for me.is there a thread on this engine build ?
That's certainly a consideration. Performance wise, several years ago we ran a test on a 400hp car with our 2.5" X connected to LT headers and then ran the same exact test with the X-pipe removed. The car dyno'd 10 extra hp to the wheels with the X-pipe on and nothing behind it! So in theory, you might add weight but you might still pickup a little extra in the quarter mile.
That being said, with X-pipes, there comes a point with really big motors where they may not increase your hp. We never tested a 3.5" X versus open headers. Some guys swear they work and some guys buy them strictly because of reduced decibels.
I think the thought was to run open headers vs the X-pipe? The difference between 3" and 3.5" back to the mufflers is less than 2 lbs. A 3" X with 3" mufflers from the headers is around 35lbs total.How much heavier (“Actual Weight”) can a 3-1/2 be over a 3 inch set up dumping at the rear axles?
Just the facts please....