I LOL'd at your post grassy. After hearing so much about the Mustangs, I finally drove one, same color as yours even.
I have had it out with his *** over there a lot. He gets pissed off when I tell the truth. That they've turned that rag into nothing more than a proving ground for high end sponsors and turned themselves into nothing but a bunch of silver spooners who take advantage of all the sponsors freebies. That really fires his *** up but it's the truth.
Car Craft used to be one of my favorites, but they went that way too. Nowadays it's all about which rag can use the highest price parts on which project. Pretty pitiful, really. Not something I'm gonna pay 7.99 an issue for.
x2....I don't give a rats *** about the crap "muscle cars" Chrysler is producing now..the cut off point should be the end of the Aspen /Volare run...
i picked up one the other cad and it was just about all the new crud...
too bad..
lmao.. aspen/volare ???? seriously? thats funny right there. only thing in that era magazine worthy is the lil red express ( and maybe a macho power wagon), other then that the cut off should be 1972 and even that is pushing it.
I agreeWell Wayne, it seems like they need to put SOMETHING in their mag besides ads. I told the guy hawking it at the Garlits show, that there was just no content. I saw that car, and the blue bee at local shows. They are both nice cars, but it must be great to have all your parts given to you, then have someone else do all the work. They seem to forget in these mags that we would actually have to pay for those $600 hood hinges. As far as new cars in the mag, They are O.K. sometimes, but there's not much the average guy can do to a late model except a cold air kit and exhaust. The prices for performance parts for new cars is nuts.
Just looking at the March 2014 edition, Front cover says "painting duster stripes" and when you look at the article it is a Dart Sport.......really!
I would think of all people they should know the difference!
why not just say "painting stripes". Just venting as I hate the Dart called a Duster.
:burnout:
Yeah...I am with you about the Aspen / Volare but many seem to really like them..
If you go to '70 or '72 then you have to go to '76 because the same car was still being produced....I could never understand the '74 cut off date at some shows..
Ian.
What about the street version Petty Kit Car? The Super Coupe? The Aspen R/T? While your opinion of those cars may be low, you cannot deny their increasing value. Those cars are worth quite a bit. Probably on par with all but the big block versions of the A body.
...
NOPE! after 72 they got the big bumpers and the dart beak. keep them out too..
yeah... big bumpers suck!
I, like Rani, like pointy nose grills..
I really love the beak on my car. It's a unique and cool looking design element and it's something the Dusters didn't get.
I subscribed to it off and on from 1998, and notice just came to renew. I told my wife to pitch it out because I think it is way overpriced esp. when they keep running the same thing over and over. Just my two cents.
so what? v wing cars are worth a lot but i still think those things are freaking ugly. the owners can keep those kit cars,not so super coupes and big bad fraud of a R/T.
1976 -Granada
1976 - Nova & GM siblings
1976 - Aspen/Volare
I'll take the Aspen/Volare.
Room for a big block with ease.
The 360-2V was a great starting point for any Hot Rod.
I came very lose to buying a 1977 Black Aspen R/T when I graduated.
Instead, took my down payment money & bought a 11-second Beveldere.
I have owned a couple of F-bodies, like them very well.
They were also great looking Pro-Stock cars.
Im gona say dirt cheep !!I wonder how much they paid for the Passon 5 speed they put in the red Dart sport?