Earlie A's latest activity
-
EEventually you run out of room for a longer rocker. We have a very tight box to work in.
-
EEarlie A replied to the thread Valvetrain Geometry.The mid-lift geometry arrangement will give the most vertical loading possible with the smallest sweep possible. Another point we have...
-
EI always assumed the goal of basic valve geometry was to work to have the downward force of The rocker directly plum with the center of...
-
ELot of good info in this post. You do have it correct, to a point. There is a skin effect when you push/draw the material through the...
-
EEarlie A replied to the thread Valvetrain Geometry.That's 0.125" per side.
-
EEarlie A replied to the thread Valvetrain Geometry.I'm pretty sure Randy told me they went from dual 1/2" wide rollers to dual 3/8" wide rollers and that solved the problems.
-
EEarlie A replied to the thread Valvetrain Geometry.I could be wrong on this but I think Randy from HS told me that the roller rockers were improved some years ago. I did not ask when.
-
EEarlie A replied to the thread Valvetrain Geometry.The Mancini rockers for SBM list a max spring diameter of 1.65". The Harland Sharp roller bearing rockers have a maximum spring...
-
-
EEarlie A replied to the thread Valvetrain Geometry.TF recommends the Harland Sharp systems for the small block heads. Harland Sharp makes some of Mancini's rockers so the Mancini stuff...
-
EEarlie A replied to the thread Valvetrain Geometry.What makes Mancini rockers correct? Do they have to be on a TF head?
-
ELots of good info here. I’ll add something though, I bet I could count on one hand the number of guys here with more than .700 net lift...
-
EYou hit on some interesting things here. One is the size of the OE shafts. They are IMO too big in diameter to allow for a needle...
-
EI can't swear to it, but I'm pretty sure that all round and rectangular aluminum stock, or "billet", are extruded. The only difference...
-
EEarlie A replied to the thread Valvetrain Geometry.You win.
