Recent content by Scatpacktom

This is a excellent thread

340 Block 360 Crank:burnout:

What would dictate whether you got the plastic or the metal? My 70 has these and I always wondered if they were correct. My car is not a stripper

Hello, I'm looking for a nice black original drivers door panel for my 72 duster 340. The car has the low line standard interior (no woodgrain insert) Also, looking for tinted drivers door glass. Please PM me here Thanks,Tom

This year I bought a 211 and a diversion 180 tig. Miller had a 400 dollar rebate on the 211 so both machines cost me 2657.00 A pretty good deal on two high quality brand name machines. They work awesome I would recommend them. I don't know if I would consider much from HF Cyberweld sells...

The 71-2 TQ intake will crush the early AVS manifold. The TQ has a large open plenum and the runners are actually about a 1/4 larger. One of the things that really hurts the AVS intake is the sharp edge on the deep side.

Is it a rallye dash harness? If it is I'm in

I'd like to be next in line if something falls through

What is going back on? NOS,AMD or Good Used?

Mr Cuda, If you were to take a head (X or J) that flowed say 240 cfm at .450 lift and you put the avs intake on the head while still on the bench you would see that you may only get a fraction of that 240cfm say maybe 208. The same test with the TQ will simply give you more, say 219. One...

It's the intake that holds the early cars back, not so much the carb. The 71 intake has a big open plenum and the runners are at least 1/4 inch larger. If you look at NHRA's engine factors the 71 has always been about 15 hp higher. Everyday my money is on the 71 340 over a early one

I would have to agree the 71 is the King of the A bodies:burnout:

Don't waste your money... Put it right back in

One thing to consider is that the X head was designed for 2.02 valves and the J head was designed to use the 1.88s. These two heads have very different short turn shapes. Even when the factory installed the 2.02 in the J they didn't fix the problem. The "area under the curve" That the chief...

Pa Karp, A little hard to read that small time slip. Does your 60ft say 2.28? I'm sure you know, but that is where I would look for my lower ET's. If you could widdle that down to 2.0 or better yet 1.9xx you could probably run a 14.0 or a teen. 1970 Duster vs 1968 GTO - YouTube