Cool or not cool?

Cool or Not Cool

  • Cool

    Votes: 162 85.7%

  • Not Cool

    Votes: 27 14.3%
  • Total voters
    189
  • Poll closed .
-
I was liking it till I saw pics of the interior . - Kinda like getting hit in the face with one of those bright orange hammers they sell at harbor freight.
 
This car is awesome!! The only thing I don't like is the decals/lettering and stripe, they should have went with chrome Charger badging on it, maybe black out the tail panel too. 70 lights or custom style lights that resemble that year would have been cool to, but the 68 lights look good. This car has some good fab skills though, it looks like a real charger at first glance :D

And yes, Chrysler/Fiat should look at cars like these, people would actually buy this stuff. I vote "Cool" on this one :glasses7:
 
When I heard that the Charger nameplate was coming back in the early/mid 2000s, this is more along the lines of what I was thinking than what they came out with. I agree about the interior, it is not to my taste. Overall, I like it.

I think it'd look a lot better with chrome bumpers on it. :D
 
It's a little too bloated for me, but other than that I like it.
 
The way the new charger should have looked in the first place. I remember hearing about the new charger at about the time i was looking to buy my mustang gt. I saw an artists rendering that was very close to the new charger, i was like come on man this thing is ugly. I drove one just to try it out. An RT model. They didnt have the old emblem with the / on it yet. Told the salesman id buy it but it has too many doors, and not enough pedals . Plus it dont look like 69 model.

I bought the 07 mustang gt. The new challenger was probably the result of a lot of hate mail over the new charger. They should have named it monaco if they made it a cop car. The slight redesign made when fiat took em over is an improvement , but its still not a charger.

This custom made one is a charger, the way chry. co. Should have redone it. Id like one but would prefer the 69/70 taillights, chrome bumpers, and standard R/T stripe. Awesome rebody.
 
I would lose the srt stripe and the tail stripe , other than that, WOW WEE,
I love it , very nice.
 
At first, I thought it was ridiculous. Found out it started life as a current Chrysler 300 (which I HATE) that was turned into a throwback Charger design, which garnished it quite a bit of points, then saw some pics of some extreme bodywork. Love it!

I'd love to see something like this replace the 4-door bullcrap they're calling a "Charger..."


- CK
 
I gotta say, I totally agree on the coments regarding the stripes. I was loving this thing untill I realized that an original 68 Charger lost its life to this creation. There is enough reproduction sheet metal on the market to build a brand new Charger of any vintage you please, why cut up a good original example?
 
daredevil said:
Damn, lets get picky.lol
Click to expand...

It isn't picky, THEY ARE TOO HIGH!

Little things like that make or break design. Lower them a little and you would see a big difference.

Like most of what was done, too much graphics, need newer style taillights and lower the damn side lights or put the 70 side lights in it. Not a fan of the 68 sidelights
 
I LOVE IT from the outside. I'd have been a bit more subtle on the inside & maybe channeled a bit more of the old school interior features in it. But You gotta love the concept of it & the work that went into it!! Chrysler TAKE NOTICE!!!
 
I am undesisded it took a lot of work to do and looks good some what but is not the real thing and the interior well enough said
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
-

Back
Top