Search results for query: *

The owners of Spook's Customs in San Antonio had one in a Savoy and I actually was blessed by getting to ride in it twice during the Bun & Barrel cruise in San Antonio. That car is a sucker punch if you're not paying attention.

I had both to choose from, I built the 400 and cleaned and bagged the 440.

400 blocks are much stronger than 440's and especially 383's. I love the 383 (got one I'm driving now) but for sheer strength it can't hold a candle to the 400 block, any 400 block!

and there you have it folks...

capped and studded 400 is from what i've seen is good for 750-800 h.p. the 451 is a great combo but the 498 is better!!! ;-)

400's are very good foundations to make potent powerplant. Very strong and are easily stroked.

to the original poster... if you plan on running a stock mill I'd take the 383, peppy performance and revs pretty good to boot. If you are gonna do some mods, I'd definitely take the 400. Incredible potential and 499/500 cubes is as easy as falling off a log! And like Stroker Scamp I have a...

stolen from www.allpar.com The 383 cubic inch RB engine was only available in 1959-1960 on the US built Chrysler Windsor and Saratoga (thanks, Ian Smale and Bill Watson); at that time, American-made Chrysler and Imperial cars used the RB blocks, with the 413 going into Imperial, New Yorker...

for big power stroker applications I'll take a 400 over a 440 any day. Love my RB's but B's hold up better in high HP applications. Shorter block means stiffer cylinders plus look at the meat where the crank sets to the cylinder wall on the RB's versus the B blocks...

and there you have it folks!

which years???