1970 La
Well-Known Member
Were did this thread go? It was in small block tech.
3.79 stroke crankshaft thread
- Thread starter 1970 La
- Start date
-
Looks like it got nuked.
dodge freak
Well-Known Member
How come, seems to be safer all the way to a 4 inch stroke, pistons need some skirt length if you want it to last many years-and be driven alot without burning oil
mopardude318
Well-Known Member
wth?? why? i was interested in that thread..
1970 La
Well-Known Member
MiradaMegaCab
Well-Known Member
rmchrgr
Skate And Destroy
Link to current 3.79" crank thread on Moparts.
Though I can't speak from personal experience, IMO the 3.79 crank is a 'better' stroke than the 4". It always looked good on paper to me, just seems like the optimal combo for our small blocks, especially for higher RPM.
The W2 340 in my Duster goes to 7K, imagine running that RPM with more cubes!
Though I can't speak from personal experience, IMO the 3.79 crank is a 'better' stroke than the 4". It always looked good on paper to me, just seems like the optimal combo for our small blocks, especially for higher RPM.
The W2 340 in my Duster goes to 7K, imagine running that RPM with more cubes!
-
