71 4dr Dart 318 w 4bbl

-
I ran an old 72 318 short block with TRW 10.5 forged pistons. I got the short block fresh from my brother. I put the top end of my 68 318 on it, with the old cam from bro's 78 Lil Red Express (stock 340 cam) with Rhoades lifters and dropped it in my daily driver 68 Barracuda fastback. (I put this combo together for under $400 as a broke college kid).

It ran great with 24" vacuum at idle. My Barracuda had the "Performance Indicator" / vacuum gauge in it, so I used it to help my driving style.

During summer days over 80° F it would overheat after 20-30 minutes of running time. I asked my engines prof what the problem could be, and he said my compression was too high and we were getting a preignition. So I found a set of 77 360 heads locally with a fresh valve job for $150 and threw them in with a stock 68 340 intake and Holley 600 vac secondary carb. (I did have the stock 318 heads and 2 bbl on it originally).

My idle vacuum was not at 22 1/2" Hg, and it still ran real strong. No more overheating over 80° F and I could get 17.75 MPG on the highway with my stock 2.76 7 1/4" rear end. It wouldn't roast the tires, but still pulled strong on acceleration. It even impressed a cop once (but that's story I'd rather not get into)....


With the high intake vacuum, I was able to put a 10.5" power valve in my carb and was able to part throttle accelerate on the highway without getting into the power valve for better economy.

The next step up Lunati cam is getting close to the .500" lift range, which I feel is too much for a daily driver. It will have a faster valve speed and will beat the seat up faster than the 60401. It will also have less vacuum, so that is why I say to go with the 60401. The less lift will also give you better fuel economy. That's a good compromise for power and economy.
 
any guidance on what valve springs to use with the 60401 and Rhodes combo? It says can use stock components but would i be better off replacing more as i go, than less?
 
any guidance on what valve springs to use with the 60401 and Rhodes combo? It says can use stock components but would i be better off replacing more as i go, than less?


I would go with the spring Lunati recommends for the 60401.
 
didnt see any recomendations or sugested parts arround.
emailed and they said 73195K1
cheers
 
TQ will run great on a stock motor, trouble with them is they are not tuneable in any manner close to a Holley or AFB. Thats why most if not all builders ditch them. You can tune them but its a learning curve using Modded Edelbrock rods and epoxy....360 4bbl intake is not a bad item, it just weighs 55 lbs compared to the 18 of a Aluminum intake...

One of the early TQ will not need much tuning if any. It would be perfect for what he wants to do. Most TQ especially the 340 and 360HP ones are perfect bolt ons with the manifold he has. I have run them from a 273 Commando to a HP 383. Just rebuild it right and adjust the air valve for just no bog. I'm still running 40 year old TQ's on two A Bodies. There are some good ones in the "for sale" section.
 
-
Back
Top