Dont mind me, I just love to debate people on a topic. Whether I agree with the debater is irrelevant, I just enjoy taking an au contraire position lol.
I certainly don't presume that a two dimensional computer system can generate life. My point was simply that using two electrical states, represented as a zero and a one, and combining them in groups "bytes" we can create larger combinations. You brought up the analogy to begin your dissertation that somehow the 280 bits of information couldn't have turned into millions of bits. Actually, the screen you are looking at proves this. Your video card is displaying 24bits of information. With 24bits of information it can display 16.7 million colors (dont believe me, check your display properties.). 32bits will display over 4 billion bits. Regardless, your 280bit analogy is flawed anyway.
If you understand your basic school science class, you should be aware that all matter on this planet (measured therefore FACT) and that measured on other celestial objects (measured and presumed FACT) is comprised of the same elements that are contained in the periodic table. There are no mystical in-between elements simply because each element is the result of adding one (1) proton to the one previously. Hydrogen - the lighest element has 1, helium the next lighest has 2, and etc. to the end of the table.
Although this table contains only 100 or so "stable" (non-radioactive or decaying elements), it is the billions of "compounds" that are made up of these elements that we should be referring to. Most common materials, ones that we eat, and are made of are made up of various combinations of 3 basic elements - Carbon (hence the term carbon-based life), Hydrogen and Oxygen. These along with combinations of the other "elements" constitute the variety of the objects we are and see. The total combinations possible are incalculable.
As far as the isotope halo argument, you should be aware that Creationist scientists -
Russell Humphreys
Larry Vardiman
Andrew Snelling
Eugene Chaffin
John Baumgardner
Steven Austin
Donald DeYoung
Stephen Boyd
from the Institute for Creation Research and the Creation Research Society believe they are the result of the heating effect during the Great Flood (which I do believe has occurred - regardless of the book the story is in)
http://creationwiki.org/Pleochroic_halos
You also are asking for proof of evolution. DNA does that, I dont have to post a billion links about this. Its available to anyone with an open mind and a PC.
Your analogy "Using our Mopars as an object lesson once again, if you choose to buy your classic based upon another mans beliefs or words, so be it..... you deserve what you get." is exactly opposite to your position. You promote the belief in "another mans beliefs or words", whether it is the spoken word of the clergy, or the written word of an apostle. In fact, you spent the last two paragraphs preaching your beliefs and position to all who read.
As far as "grossly" misquoting you. I do not mind being labelled wrong, but please don't call me wrong, then not show me where. That is just contradictory. I also think if you were not referring to me when you said "(That's also one of the errors of the liberals and atheists who ram evolution down our childrens throats with no opposing viewpoints)", then you could have at least put it in a separate sentence, nevermind a new paragraph. No offense taken though.
"Such an idea also defies the second law of thermodynamics, which in simplicity states that everything in the universe "slows down, and wears down".......it does NOT increase, and it does not become more complex..........the opposite is true according to the laws of physics."
Unfortunately this is not even close to a definition for the 2nd law. The 2nd law is that in an isolated environement, any imbalance in TEMPERATURE will eventually balance itself out, until it reaches equilibrium or balance. It has nothing to do with "slowing down" or wearing down.
Please be aware that I harbor no ill will or bad feelings towards anyone expressing their belief, and I dont consider the teaching of religion to my child as the ramming of creationism down her throat, as you apparently feel about evolution. I simply am against extremism by any religious group that believes "their" way is the only way.
Respectfully,
Grant