How much distance between your ego and your real self?

-

TrailBeast

AKA Mopars4us on Youtube
Joined
Mar 11, 2011
Messages
22,958
Reaction score
13,102
Location
Arizona
I have wanted to post this for a long time now because I honestly feel that if everyone could come as close to this as we can there would be a ton less problems among the inhabitants of this planet.
I admit I have a pretty fair sized ego that was born from abilities and knowledge that I feel I have.
This is normal for the most part for a mentally healthy existence (or as close as we can have to one with our baggage that we all carry, and eventually from time to time burden others with.)

Here's one very helpful thought process I learned from the man in the video posted below.
He says everyone has ego, but it is not and does not have to determine who and what we are as a person.
The ego would like to do exactly this.
It would like to tell you and everyone else in the world who they are and exactly what you and they are worth as a person, as a father, as a husband and on and on.

The trick is to realize that the ego IS NOT you, but only a part of you that can be recognized as what it is and does for us, or to us in our daily lives.

Approximately 90 percent of what we say around others before we think is the ego talking, and not who you really are or want to be for yourself or others around you.
When we can realize this, we can then begin to create a space between that ego and our real person.
Just realizing that the ego wants to be first to speak is half the battle in creating this defensible space between our real selves and that which would like to be in total control of us.
It exists purely to be in control and right about everything, and fights hard to make us allow it by justification.

Example:
"I know that probably hurt that person but what a dumba**." (justification by applying a label)
Just like laws that allow imprisonment, torture, and abuse of basic human rights by law or God because one is labeled a terrorist.
Applying labels to people only serves to take the humanity and compassion out of the equation and distance ourselves from the reality of the situation.

There needs to a what I call "defensible space" between these parts that make up our whole person so that we realize they are there and that they can be changed if we wish.
Enough space so that we may separate our ego from our conciousness enough to realize it is the ego talking when it is, and not the actual peron we are or wish to be.

So, the ego will try to justify it's assertion by any means neccesary to acomplish it's goal.
That goal is almost ALWAYS to convince us that we are better, worth more to society, or just plain more evolved than others.
That justification for our actions or words are what the ego thrives upon.

When we as a race (ALL humans) learn this single thing about ourselves and refuse to give the ego the first and final word, we will be taking our first meaningful steps to becoming a race of people capable of making some fantastic changes for the better on this planet.
Until then, it ain't gonna happen.

If you got this far in reading this post on such a "boring", "stupid", "does not apply to me" "who the F does this person think he is" post then I congratulate you, as you are the begining and hopfully the future of this awareness as well as the teachers of it.

The ones that didn't read this far very likely have an unconrollable ego, and as as such labled this post as stupid, rediculous, or doesn't apply to them.
It applies to all, but some ego's will not allow it to be read, heard or even considered due to it's wish to be right, in total control of it's person and justified in doing so.


Here's a super short video that explains what I mentioned that helped me to see the existance of this in us, and how to lessen it's control over us. [ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EEc5-hVZ1CA"]The end of the Ego; The Awakening by Eckhart Tolle - YouTube[/ame]

The whole series is 8 CD's and is hours and hours getting really in depth on the subject of ego, thought processes and how it affects our own definition of who we are.

Thank you for your time.
 
Good thought, but, the reality is, it won't happen, not because it can't, but because it amounts to making some difficult choices. As we know from basic human nature studies, if given a "choice", most will take the easiest route through life.
For some it's a lack of education, for others it's a need to play the entitlements system and live off the sweat of others, for still other people it's living outside the law by stealing and lying, and, and for others it's totally off the deep end and results in physical harm to others, and even murder.

Doing the right thing is also a choice, but it's a more difficult one as it requires commitment. John Adams once said that there are only two types of creature in the world: Those with Commitment, and those who require the Commitment of others.

Keeping ego in check, is a difficult thing to do, and the failure to do so often lends to overloading one's ***.

Personally, I've have always tried to be the person who is responsible, caring, and even if my comments don't show that to be the case. I always, at least, try to be helpful, but, in many cases, especially on the internet with it's lack of inflection ans syntax, that sometimes comes over as sarcasm or possibly even a personal attack.
Usually my ego comes into play when I'm verbally assaulted first, I will then return in kind, though sometimes remorsefully, as it wasn't my intention to create, or participate in an exchange of egos.

The article makes a good argument, but, unfortunately, I don't believe the goal is achievable, but that still doesn't mean we shouldn't try. But, while doing so, we should also remember that we ARE human's, not gods, and therefore fallible.
 
Good thought, but, the reality is, it won't happen, .

Exactly. "We" were just talking about this, let's review history, some of the most important (bad) decisions on the planet

The Titanic was "unsinkable." Even after it had a gigantic hole in the side, at least for a while, it was "unsinkable." Ego. The builders, the designers, and most important the ship's Captain.

Fast forward over quite - a - few decades to the Costa Concordia. "It won't happen." "It CAN'T happen. My ego is too big." Well, it DID

And ......recently, the Korean ferry disaster. Ego

There are many many other examples.

The point is, over hundreds of years "we" haven't learned a thing.
 
Well, it never hurts to try to be better and more thoughtful before speaking, that's for sure!
 

-
Back
Top Bottom