ValiantRacing
Well-Known Member
Have you tried a different ignition system? do you run the red stuff?Getting every little bit out of a combination is fun, but at some point you start running out of ideas to try. That's about where I am with my car.
Have you tried a different ignition system? do you run the red stuff?Getting every little bit out of a combination is fun, but at some point you start running out of ideas to try. That's about where I am with my car.
Nothing wrong with big cubes either !I've never been more ashamed of having a 470 cubic inch big block lol (not)
The goal for me is just enough and not enough.Nothing wrong with big cubes either !![]()
Not sure I understand the scope of the question so, I hesitated to reply. In any class racing, the goal is to eek everything and more out of the parts that are legal. These are classes where typically stuff runs better than it should. It's something I have always enjoyed trying to do whether it was a soapbox car, a friends car or my Valiant, etc... I think I did well relatively. With that said I feel the car would pick-up about two tenths more with some minor changes. So, in what I think the scope of the thread is about, in the case of my current combo, I'm probably done chasing the last bit out for a few reasons. One being, the expected results wouldn't likely advance my position in eliminations. So, the time 'wasted' in getting the last bit out of this combo is better spent on a better combo. With that said, if the current combo hadn't run near par with what I expected, I probably would be driven to figure out 'why'.A set combo, with no major changes. "Wow, you did good for your combo! You got the most out of it!". I don't believe that the most has been gotten out of any combo. Not the engine. Not the TC/Transmission. Not the suspension/body. Hidden in all the components, there is tenths..... or hundredths... or even thousands.
A set combo, with no major changes.
Not sure I understand the scope of the question so, I hesitated to reply.
Just meant to keep tuning on a combo without changing the majors. In other words, can we get (or how far can we get) if we stick to the "basic combo" and can we reach the limitations, if there are any limitations. And no, starting with a 318 and ending up at 512 is not sticking with the basic combo and tuning it LOL And you don't tune factory J heads up to Trick Flows. LOLThis.
Without a clear explanation of what is: “a set combo” and “no major changes”, it’s a bit of a circular discussion.
Tuning with no part changing, has a limitation, in the context of being controllable and measurable. Ie - diminishing returns, coupled with unquantifiable returns per change.
The nature of street cars makes it more difficult than with dedicated race cars. When I get down to about +/- 0.03 sec. change in et, I cannot conclude if a car/engine change actually made a difference.
That being said about the j head at some point if the goal is "faster" one would step up to a better cylinder head, then there's the point that trickflows need to be bettered.Just meant to keep tuning on a combo without changing the majors. In other words, can we get (or how far can we get) if we stick to the "basic combo" and can we reach the limitations, if there are any limitations. And no, starting with a 318 and ending up at 512 is not sticking with the basic combo and tuning it LOL And you don't tune factory J heads up to Trick Flows. LOL![]()
Then once you replace j heads with trick flows, or a 3.58 crank with a 4" crank, you have lost the potential of the combo. Like the title says, "Is there ever... Never any more??" We KNOW if you buy nice performance pieces you go faster. But how fast and is there a limit without those pieces and just tune, tune, tune baby???That being said about the j head at some point if the goal is "faster" one would step up to a better cylinder head, then there's the point that trickflows need to be bettered.
Then once you replace j heads with trick flows, or a 3.58 crank with a 4" crank, you have lost the potential of the combo. Like the title says, "Is there ever... Never any more??" We KNOW if you buy nice performance pieces you go faster. But how fast and is there a limit without those pieces and just tune, tune, tune baby???How about stupid simple: What does a Plymouth Duster 318 2bbl 2.76 gears run, and what can it run? If you put a 408 w/trick flow heads you cannot say my 318 2bbl ran 11.50's LOL
That 408 with TrickFlow heads in Duster better run faster than 11.50! Or you got some serious tuning to do!! lolMy point is you have to tune, tune, tune baby no matter what you're building. From what I'm reading it seems that buying better parts takes no tuning.Then once you replace j heads with trick flows, or a 3.58 crank with a 4" crank, you have lost the potential of the combo. Like the title says, "Is there ever... Never any more??" We KNOW if you buy nice performance pieces you go faster. But how fast and is there a limit without those pieces and just tune, tune, tune baby???How about stupid simple: What does a Plymouth Duster 318 2bbl 2.76 gears run, and what can it run? If you put a 408 w/trick flow heads you cannot say my 318 2bbl ran 11.50's LOL
For some reason you are seeing this as "no big cubes or performance parts allowed...lol" I'm just saying once you have your combo, what is the limit?. Regardless if it's a 225 1bbl or a 572 crate engine. Can 22.00 become 19.50? Or for the 572 can 6.40 become 5.90? Without the splurging of "more parts". LOLMy point is you have to tune, tune, tune baby no matter what you're building. From what I'm reading it seems that buying better parts takes no tuning.
I have a 470, Andy f set the mark as far as I'm concerned with all his testing and the 2 combos he put forward of his 470.
I'm chasing that using way less expensive parts and doing my own stuff like welding up the runners on my tunnel ram and porting for a better designed runner. Making sure things like my cylinders were notched so the intake mixture didn't slam into the deck before be lit. Making more compression, fitting the tunnel ram correctly and port matching...there's a lot things that have to be done for optimization even when you buy parts.
Honestly I don't want to tune a 318 2bbl with those gears lol and I respect the fact that you do and get it done. That being said if I had too I would and it would most likely be very enjoyable.
Okay, yeah that's what I was seeing lol.For some reason you are seeing this as "no big cubes or performance parts allowed...lol" I'm just saying once you have your combo, what is the limit?. Regardless if it's a 225 1bbl or a 572 crate engine. Can 22.00 become 19.50? Or for the 572 can 6.40 become 5.90? Without the splurging of "more parts". LOL
Yes. If You work long & hard on Your combo, there is a point where You'll run out of improvements, how close You are at the outset will determine how long that takes.For some reason you are seeing this as "no big cubes or performance parts allowed...lol" I'm just saying once you have your combo, what is the limit?. Regardless if it's a 225 1bbl or a 572 crate engine. Can 22.00 become 19.50? Or for the 572 can 6.40 become 5.90? Without the splurging of "more parts". LOL
10-4 !The philosophy of life on this thread is golden. Replace the car theme with life and you'll see what I mean. More about the car later...
With the avatar, I started at roughly 11.8 and have now run a best of 11.07. So call it 3/4 of a second.Yes. If You work long & hard on Your combo, there is a point where You'll run out of improvements, how close You are at the outset will determine how long that takes.
It's said that after the 1st 'clean' pass w/a new combo, (no fuel starvation, ignition/misfire problems, etc.), there's ~a full second left in E.T. I have seen a number of cases that back that up.