jonnyboy1617
Active Member
Ive been playing around with "Dyno 2003", sometimes its fairly accurate but other times seems pretty far off. So here is the thing, I was playing with different cam grinds and ran into a profile that gave me good high rpm torque, decent upper power, and still kept my dynamic compression ratio decent, (which is a problem, I have 9.3:1 static and I'm trying to find a raunchier cam.)
One thing I'm worried about is trusting numbers from a program to give me accurate hp and torque results. Another thing is wondering if it actually knows how the valve timing is affecting performance. For example, would it know if the intake valve is opening too late or too early, robbing performance, ect? I will probably be giving CompCams a call here soon to get an opinion of the cam grind, but what do you all think? Here is a Picture of the simulated dyno and the major specs will be below that.

360ci, fully ported J heads (flow data pulled from stan weiss' list), RPM Airgap dual plane, hedman headers, holley SA 670cfm, 9.3:1 static (7.89:1 dynamic with cam below)
And for the cam...
True IVO: 21.5 IVC: 53.5 EVO: 68.5 EVC: 36.5.
Duration (seat to seat) 255/285. Lift (.050): .530/.530.
Intake, exhaust, and lobe center angle: 106. Valve overlap: 58.
The chart also says I will be pulling an average vacuum of 14.5 in. hg. Would this be too low? I don't mind having a rougher idle as long as it doesn't die at stoplights, And I do have power steering, but no power brakes or air conditioner.
Does anyone have an idea of how it would act? Or does anybody have a good simulator, like engine analyzer? Thanks for any input.
One thing I'm worried about is trusting numbers from a program to give me accurate hp and torque results. Another thing is wondering if it actually knows how the valve timing is affecting performance. For example, would it know if the intake valve is opening too late or too early, robbing performance, ect? I will probably be giving CompCams a call here soon to get an opinion of the cam grind, but what do you all think? Here is a Picture of the simulated dyno and the major specs will be below that.

360ci, fully ported J heads (flow data pulled from stan weiss' list), RPM Airgap dual plane, hedman headers, holley SA 670cfm, 9.3:1 static (7.89:1 dynamic with cam below)
And for the cam...
True IVO: 21.5 IVC: 53.5 EVO: 68.5 EVC: 36.5.
Duration (seat to seat) 255/285. Lift (.050): .530/.530.
Intake, exhaust, and lobe center angle: 106. Valve overlap: 58.
The chart also says I will be pulling an average vacuum of 14.5 in. hg. Would this be too low? I don't mind having a rougher idle as long as it doesn't die at stoplights, And I do have power steering, but no power brakes or air conditioner.
Does anyone have an idea of how it would act? Or does anybody have a good simulator, like engine analyzer? Thanks for any input.