Rat Patrol
Well-Known Member
This question is in part a response to Rockinrobin's question.
Heres the results of my vac Gauge testing -
Scenario 1 - My motor draws 16" of vacuum (makes 6.84 PSIa man pressure) at 850 rpm - idle - so my timing is 16 static plus 12 MAP = 28
Scenario 2 - It draws 20" (makes 4.88 PSIa) at cruise at 2500 rpm so thats 24deg RPM + 12 deg MAP = 36 total
Scenario 3 - It draws 10" (makes 9.5 PSIa) during part throttle acceleration on primaries between 2000 and 6000 rpm. This means with my current MAP settings...it's still adding around 5 degrees on top of RPM timing under light acceleration.
Two questions:
I am wondering if I should change the MAP so that it relies solely on RPM timing under light acceleration conditions (refer scenario 3)?
Should I also add more MAP timing at idle (refer scenario 1)?
Heres the results of my vac Gauge testing -
Scenario 1 - My motor draws 16" of vacuum (makes 6.84 PSIa man pressure) at 850 rpm - idle - so my timing is 16 static plus 12 MAP = 28
Scenario 2 - It draws 20" (makes 4.88 PSIa) at cruise at 2500 rpm so thats 24deg RPM + 12 deg MAP = 36 total
Scenario 3 - It draws 10" (makes 9.5 PSIa) during part throttle acceleration on primaries between 2000 and 6000 rpm. This means with my current MAP settings...it's still adding around 5 degrees on top of RPM timing under light acceleration.
Two questions:
I am wondering if I should change the MAP so that it relies solely on RPM timing under light acceleration conditions (refer scenario 3)?
Should I also add more MAP timing at idle (refer scenario 1)?