Usps won't save money!!

-

Denvermike

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 21, 2010
Messages
506
Reaction score
187
Location
Denver
Some of you may have seen a story about how the USPS is using 20-27 year old vehicles and is worried about the replacement cost. Here is the truth. A private company that builds electric cars offered the USPS a deal. They would provide cars that would run a full route without being charged. The USPS would only pay the amount they are already spending now for gas, maintenance, etc. on the same number of existing cars. This included the charging system that would not required paving to be dug up or the cars to be plugged in. This package meant that costs would not go up but the USPS would have brand new much greener cars. Mangers along the way said a BIG YES as the plan for the test package went up the chain. A single $/#`+ said NO the USPS will only use gasoline powered cars. So ends the govt. trying to saving money or go a little greener.
 
Not to worry, USPS is bleeding money, and anything they buy will be added to our unfunded liabilities.

Presently our unfunded liabilities are approaching 100 Trillion dollars, and climbing. That's more money than exists on the planet, and we're STILL spending more. We couldn't ever pay that debt, off, so adding to it is looked at as no big deal. For those of us who pay attention to what the government spends, the reality is sickening. The old adage is correct, "Ignorance IS bliss".



USPS reports $1.9B loss in 3-month period

By Tyler DunnPublished: May 9, 2014, 8:23 am




http://lintvkoin.files.wordpress.com/2013/04/a137684b1553a70c2e0f6a706700d8e4.jpg?w=512 FILE - In this Feb. 7, 2014 file photo, U.S. Postal Service letter carrier Jamesa Euler, delivers mail in the rain in the Cabbagetown neighborhood, in Atlanta. The U.S. Postal Service says it will delay plans to cut Saturday mail delivery because Congress isn't allowing the change. The Postal Service said in February that it planned to cut back in August to five-day-a-week deliveries for everything except packages, as a way to hold down losses. (AP Photo/David Goldman) WASHINGTON (AP) — The U.S. Postal Service reported a $1.9 billion loss for the first three months of this year and pleaded again Friday for reforms to its troubled financial system.
The agency said the loss for the quarter that ended March 31 matched the $1.9 billion in red ink in the same period last year and marked the 20th time of the last 22 quarters that it posted a loss.
It came despite a 2.3 percent rise in its operating revenue and continued cost-cutting efforts. Postal officials have said repeatedly that they need comprehensive legislation that includes more control over its personnel and benefit costs and more flexibility in pricing and products. Though various legislative proposals have been advanced, Congress has not passed a bill with the requested changes.
“The Postal Service is working diligently to improve its finances by streamlining our network to improve efficiency, reduce operating costs and increase revenue, which was up $379 million over the same period last year — the third straight quarter of revenue increase,” Postmaster General Patrick Donahoe said in a statement. “However, we will still incur annual inflationary cost increases … and first-class mail volume continues to decline.”
Details in the report for the second quarter of the budget year, compared to the same period last year, included:
—Operating revenue was $16.7 billion, an increase of $379 million or 2.3 percent.
—Operating expenses before non-cash workers’ compensation expenses were cut to $17.9 billion from $18.1 billion, a 1.1 percent improvement.
—Total mail volume fell to 38.1 billion pieces from 38.8 billion pieces.
—Volume in shipping and packages rose 7.3 percent.
—First-class mail declined 4.1 percent.
The Postal Service is an independent agency that receives no tax dollars for its day-to-day operations but is subject to congressional control. It has asked to end most Saturday deliveries, a move it says could save about $2 billion annually. And it’s seeking to reduce its congressionally mandated $5.6 billion annual payment for future retiree health benefits.
The pre-funding requirement for future retiree health benefits accounts for the brunt of the agency’s red ink and the agency has defaulted on a number of the congressionally-mandated payments. Officials note the solution to their financial problems is much larger than just addressing the retiree issue.
“Some comments in recent news reports suggest that all we need from Congress is help with restructuring our retiree health benefit plan,” chief financial officer Joseph Corbett said. “Nothing can be further from the truth. Our liabilities exceed our assets by $42 billion and we have a need for more than $10 billion to invest in new delivery vehicles, package sortation equipment, and other deferred investments.
“We haven’t been making the retiree health benefit prefunding payments because we can’t,” Corbett said, adding that if the retiree requirement was reduced, it still wouldn’t give the agency any more cash to pay down its debt or put needed capital into the business.
“Only comprehensive postal legislation … will provide the necessary cash flows,” Corbett said.
 
And where did you hear this about the electric vehicles. :dontknow:

Care to provide a link to that story.
 
Yes, I want a link also, because so far, we do not have the technology for a charging system that doesn't have to be "plugged in". If that existed, electric cars would be runnin around everywhere. They are not.
 
thell go all electric and recharge them with gas generators.go government and piss away those dollars you can always take more from the population
 
As a former USPS employee I can tell you that ANYONE that tries to apply ANY SORT of logic to damn near anything that the USPS does is a fool. Want to fast track your way from lowly craft employee to a nice cushy $95k@year job? Get into management, either thru the lowly 204b program or the ASP program, sexually harass a few employees and be patient. You will be removed from a position that deals with employees and given a job often times created just for you....as to the employee that filed the compliant they will often be awarded the 300k that EEOC allows....as well as attorney costs etc. One former employee won close to 3 million....the "boss" that committed the offense......got a 1 year gig in Hawaii...put up in a 4 star hotel, with a $300 a day spending allowance for himself....and get this....his wife who was not even a USPS employee got to go with him and she got the same allowance....
This is the very scum bag "boss" that ultimately led to my wife being forced into a disability retirement....
 
Our government is out of control and doing whatever they want. Rules/laws don't mean a thing to them. :finga:

Anything our government controls gets screwed up. It's just a matter of time until the lobbyists buy off Washington and they close the post office and let the private companies rape us after their "competition" is gone....
 
The info I posted came from a person that was involved in the proposal. I have known him for several years and he is not one to make up tails of this type.
 
Ok, then by comparison that will make a flat rate box ship for about $100. Yea, that would really work... NOT!!!

Well then they could deliver the mail with big block Darts. It would be much faster and when they were a year or so old the could sell them at auction. I see this this as a win win for the country. Got ya.
 
Our government is out of control and doing whatever they want. Rules/laws don't mean a thing to them. :finga:

Anything our government controls gets screwed up. It's just a matter of time until the lobbyists buy off Washington and they close the post office and let the private companies rape us after their "competition" is gone....

...yet many here voted to have this same government take control of their health care, their finances, and their private records, even in light of the "runaway government syndrome" they still defend that choice. Strange, eh?
 
government has been broke for many decades. follow the money trail. it always lead you to those that will do anything to anyone for a buck.... sad.
weekend delivery??? WHY would anyone require sat delivery!??? I get enough bills during the week!!????
 
Ordered something from amazon using their free delivery option. Showed up on a Sunday (!), via USPS.

Gov't is about control. That electric vehicle proposal was doomed from the start because the USPS wouldn't have had control. Same thing happened when one of the oil Co's offered LA DWP their excess generated electricity (nat gas fueled gas turbine generators = no diff in cost btwn max power output and what the platforms needed). DWP didn't have control of the source so they weren't interested even though LA was suffering rolling black-outs that summer.
 
government has been broke for many decades. follow the money trail. it always lead you to those that will do anything to anyone for a buck.... sad.
weekend delivery??? WHY would anyone require sat delivery!??? I get enough bills during the week!!????

At one time just about everything moved via the mail. Before UPS. Fed Ex., DHL, and who ever else, most packages small enough to for one person to handle went via Parcel Post, too. The original idea of Saturday Delivery was to lighten the Monday morning load. I could be wrong, but I don't think the post office suffers from that ailment any longer.
 

-
Back
Top Bottom