jos51700
Green Bearing thread connoisseur
To be clear, I'm not talking about your typical rust in a quarter panel or floor. I'm talking rust EVERYWHERE on a car; the rust leaves a car as swiss cheese, where there's not much to work with.
Background: I'm in Missouri. We salt our roads. I know how much rust my cars get every year, but some of my cars...I wonder if they lived in a lead-acid battery plant before I got them. My '75 Valiant is an absolute rust bucket. The tops of the quarter panels have rusted out. The friggin' dashboard rusted out. It seems like it's continued to rust despite being mostly parked for a decade.
My '72 Dart on the other hand, has sat for more time, I've owned (and not maintained) it longer than the Valiant, the top rotted off exposing the unpainted roof to the elements, and it hasn't really rusted much at all through the years.
I have two '92 Dakotas....Same thing; one truck had the frame rust through where the rear cross member bolted up. The upper windshield frame has rusted through in places. It's just RUSTY. The other truck...clean. Nothing more than surface rust, and that's even limited. They've both been in Missouri for the last 25 years.
So, I've heard everything from "thinner sheetmetal after '72 to save weight for fuel economy" to "St. Louis vs. Hamtramck vs. wherever", to "the battery ground is hooked up poorly or wrong so the body is being used like a sacrificial anode". I understand that region plays a huge role, but all of my cars have been in my possession in the same area for 20+ years. I've owned my Dart and Valiant since the mid '90's, and the Valiant floorboard was rusted out even then.
What say you guys? This "Daytona Superbird" is a good example. Even the chrome is rotted off the bumper! The deck lid is roached. It looks like it was driven through a puddle of battery acid. The car has clearly seen a repaint, but WHY is the rust so aggressive on this versus other cars?
Background: I'm in Missouri. We salt our roads. I know how much rust my cars get every year, but some of my cars...I wonder if they lived in a lead-acid battery plant before I got them. My '75 Valiant is an absolute rust bucket. The tops of the quarter panels have rusted out. The friggin' dashboard rusted out. It seems like it's continued to rust despite being mostly parked for a decade.
My '72 Dart on the other hand, has sat for more time, I've owned (and not maintained) it longer than the Valiant, the top rotted off exposing the unpainted roof to the elements, and it hasn't really rusted much at all through the years.
I have two '92 Dakotas....Same thing; one truck had the frame rust through where the rear cross member bolted up. The upper windshield frame has rusted through in places. It's just RUSTY. The other truck...clean. Nothing more than surface rust, and that's even limited. They've both been in Missouri for the last 25 years.
So, I've heard everything from "thinner sheetmetal after '72 to save weight for fuel economy" to "St. Louis vs. Hamtramck vs. wherever", to "the battery ground is hooked up poorly or wrong so the body is being used like a sacrificial anode". I understand that region plays a huge role, but all of my cars have been in my possession in the same area for 20+ years. I've owned my Dart and Valiant since the mid '90's, and the Valiant floorboard was rusted out even then.
What say you guys? This "Daytona Superbird" is a good example. Even the chrome is rotted off the bumper! The deck lid is roached. It looks like it was driven through a puddle of battery acid. The car has clearly seen a repaint, but WHY is the rust so aggressive on this versus other cars?