That woman is pretty stupid. She says she's gonna fight it in court. Even if the court decides the flags are not part of the fence, the lattice underneath surely is. And that's definitely over the city code's limit as well. I'd laugh if the court said the flags can stay but the lattice fence extension on all sides of the property need to come down.
It wouldn't matter if they were tarps instead of flags because they are against the ordinance and they just happen to be flags. All she needs to do is lower them under the 66" law and enjoy them at the legal height.
That woman is pretty stupid. She says she's gonna fight it in court. Even if the court decides the flags are not part of the fence, the lattice underneath surely is. And that's definitely over the city code's limit as well. I'd laugh if the court said the flags can stay but the lattice fence extension on all sides of the property need to come down.
..who was the silly tard who said fences could only be so high..it it is a subdivision , if it is a covenant, is not enforceable...
..who was the silly tard who said fences could only be so high..it it is a subdivision , if it is a covenant, is not enforceable...
Do they also have to have 3 kids, drive a Saturn and eat out an micky dD's once a week...
Reminds me of the movie "over the hedge"..
I live in a very high covenanted subdivion..the first person who moved in a built a house broke a bunch of them...so much for that..
Neighbours should mind their own business...
Google up our esteemed former woman candidate for VP from AK and her 20-some-ft-high fence sometime.
I didn't think you guys liked being told what you can/ cannot do with your land ?
Not covenant..which didn't make sense..BTW, I went to a lawyer about the covenants that were attached to our property and he said they had no teeth..
one of the conveants was no clotheslines..we all have them..or we did until I pulled ours down..
but this is municipal code...so some twit decided that home owners can only put fences to some artificial height... sounds like a rights violation..
We don't, but, if you agree to it in a covenant, or buy property where the ordinance dis-allows something, that on you. No one is forcing you to buy property with those restrictions, it's something you decided to do. When you made that decision you also agreed to those rules. like it or not.I didn't think you guys liked being told what you can/ cannot do with your land ?